Image is of container ships waiting outside the canal. While there is usually some number of ships waiting for passage, the number has increased significantly lately.


In order to move ships through the Panama Canal, water is needed to fill the locks. The water comes from freshwater lakes, which are replenished by rainfall. This rainfall hasn't been coming, and Lake Gatun, the largest one, is at near record low levels.

Hundreds of ships are now in a maritime traffic jam, unable to cross the canal quickly. Panama is attempting to conserve water and have reduced the number of transits by 20% per day, among other measures. The Canal's adminstrators have warned that these drought conditions will remain for at least 10 months.

It is unlikely that global supply chains will be catastrophically affected, at least this year. Costs may increase for consumers in the coming months, especially for Christmas, but by and large goods will continue to flow, around South America if need be. Nonetheless, projecting trends over the coming years and decades, you can imagine how this is yet another nudge by climate change towards dramatic economic, environmental, and political impacts on the world at large. It also might prompt discussions inside various governments about nearshoring, and the general vulnerability of global supply chains - especially as the United States tries, bafflingly, to go to war with China.


After some discussion in the last megathread about building knowledge of geopolitics, some of us thought it might be an interesting idea to have a Country of the Week - essentially, I/we choose a country and then people can come in here and chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants, related to that country. More detail in this comment.

Here is the map of the Ukraine conflict, courtesy of Wikipedia.

Okay, look, I got a little carried away. Monday's update usually covers the preceding Friday, Saturday, and Sunday, but I went ahead and did all of last week. If people like a more weekly structure then I might try that instead, if not, then I'll go back to the Mon-Wed-Fri schedule.

Links and Stuff

The bulletins site is down.

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists

Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Add to the above list if you can.


Resources For Understanding The War


Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.

Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.

Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.

Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.

On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.


Telegram Channels

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

Pro-Russian

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.

https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.

https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.

https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.

https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.

https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.

https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.

https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.

https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.

https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine

Almost every Western media outlet.

https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.

https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


Last week's discussion post.


  • BynarsAreOk [none/use name]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Two opinion polls about the mood in Russia at the moment.

    The first is by Levada Centar, a western funded organisation located in Estonia.

    50% of Russians are for peace negotiations, 38% believe military operations should continue no matter what. But only 20% believe that for the sake of peace and the end of the NWO, it is possible to make concessions to Ukraine. 71% believe that there is no need to make concessions.

    Most Russians are ready for the sake of peace to agree to exchange of prisoners of war (82% are totally in favour, another 10% find it acceptable).

    -55% consider an immediate ceasefire preferable, another 17% acceptable, although here we have a significant 21% who are categorically against it).

    But Russians do not agree under any circumstances that Ukraine will be able to join NATO (categorically against - 76%) or returning new territories to Ukraine (76% are categorically against the return of the LPR and DPR, 68% are categorically against the return of Zaporozhye and Kherson regions).

    Compared to the same poll in February of this year, more Russians consider it unacceptable to return the New Territories to Ukraine. The position on Ukraine in NATO has not changed at all since last year.

    70% say they support the actions of the Russian armed forces in Ukraine. In July it was 75%, in June 73%.

    In another, by VTsIOM, a large russian institute, 67% of Russians support shifting the priorities in its relations from Europe and US to Eastern countries. 11% are against, 15% say they don't care, 7% find it difficult to answer. Young people are more likely to be indifferent, but not to be against it.

    TL;DR Putin's declared objection to Ukraine joining NATO is still a position supported by the vast majority(76%!) of population. Likewise there is no sign Russians believe in general to be in a losing position i.e no concessions and no returning gained territories(Kherson, Zapo, DPR, LPR).

    For any lib out there thinking Putin is some unpopular dictator and where the Russians are just waiting anxiously for the opportunity for some regime change because something something democracy.

    • mkultrawide [any]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The most fun you can have with NATO liberals is showing them videos of Russian politicians to the right to Putin and explaining to them that Putin is a Moderate™️.

      • MoreAmphibians [none/use name]
        ·
        1 year ago

        During Prigozhin's wild ride the US delayed sanctions on Wagner and removed him from the FBI's most wanted list. It's incredible that this is the guy that the US wanted in charge of Russia and its nukes.

        • RyanGosling [none/use name]
          ·
          1 year ago

          Weird how the US keeps removing terrorists off their list whenever they start to show hostilities towards their enemies.

    • edge [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      For any lib out there thinking Putin is some unpopular dictator and where the Russians are just waiting anxiously for the opportunity for some regime change because something something democracy.

      Unfortunately at this point most libs believe (and this data will back up in their minds) that Russians are all evil "orcs" supporting Putin's "genocide" because their skull shape makes them predisposed towards violence.

    • AbbysMuscles [she/her]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ah, so the Russian orkish brainpan truly is violent and incapable of joining the civilized West. We have no choice to but destroy their nation, partition their lands, and impoverish their people.

      • VILenin [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Careful, you might catch some liberals spouting their “racial garden” shit speaking like that

    • RyanGosling [none/use name]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I do find it funny and annoying that libs cannot fathom the support for this war by Russians. This war is almost analogous to the Vietnam war.

      Most Americans are nominally against the war, but only because their boys in green died. They still worship those soldiers and think the cause was noble, but the war was dishonorable because the US wasn’t focusing on the cause of were not succeeding. Fucking Biden awarded Vietnam vets medal during the invasion of Ukraine. This was before he gave a speech denouncing “imperial ambitions.”

      Liberals pretend like Russians supporting the invasion is some genetic abnormality exclusive to to Russia when their opinions are largely the same as Americans’ on practically any war after WWII. I mean, ask any liberal right now if they’re willing to concede Afghanistan’s assets to the Taliban if it means the citizens’ economic suffering can be alleviated temporarily. They would rather every Afghan die of starvation and opium addiction than to send a penny over, and they will also say they support Afghan women’s rights at the same time.

      Soon the liberals of Russia will create shoot and cry movies and the west will react with revulsion after jerking off to Apocalypse Now.