There’s something inherently repulsive about smarmy liberal language, and the juxtaposition with Playboy is just too much

  • tactical_trans_karen [she/her, comrade/them]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Based Mia. Playboy has always been a liberal elitist wannabe publication. What little 'journalism" they've actually done over the years is just a cliff notes Rolling Stone with porn and extra spicy misogyny on top.

      • Redcuban1959 [any]
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, but they used to publish interviews with politicians and some other important people. Iirc, an interview that Jimmy Carter gave to Playboy talking about cutting aid to the military Juntas in South America (mostly because Brazil and Argentina were developing Nuclear Weapons with West Germany's help) which caused panic and accelerated their collapse.

      • captcha [any]
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I believe Hunter S Thompson used to write for them.

        • Frank [he/him, he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah. "I just read it for the articles", was as much a real thing as a joke. Playboy hired many serious writers and journalists to pen articles for them over the years. In terms of page count the nudes were a relatively small part of the magazine. Certainly the focus, but if you just wanted to read it for the articles there were often articles worth reading.

      • TreadOnMe [none/use name]
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        To piggyback on what @captcha@hexbear.net said, most significant sci-fi authors of the 60's and 70's found their mainstream audiences through Playboy (though obviously in retrospect most of what they wrote was fairly reactionary trash, but better reactionary trash than the majority of fiction that was written then), even people like Isaac Asimov wrote fiction for Playboy at one point. Otherwise they were never really known for their "journalism".