yea

  • RoabeArt [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The warp drive seems to be almost instantaneous in the Abrams Star Trek movies, too. In the second one, the Enterprise traveled from Klingon space to the outskirts of Earth in a matter of minutes. In Deep Space Nine, that journey took about ten days.

    At that point you wonder why ships in the JJ-verse even need to have multiple crew shifts and sleeping arrangements, if they can zip to whatever planet they like in the time it takes to cook a Pop Tart.

    • Flyberius [comrade/them]
      ·
      8 months ago

      It's a dumb fun movie and you just need to stop nerding out over things like that. Star Trek was never hard sci-fi, never was.

      • UlyssesT [he/him]
        hexagon
        ·
        8 months ago

        Star Trek was never hard sci-fi, never was.

        Maybe not, but it was always about fairly long journeys of days, weeks, months, even years. Instant travel removes the core of the experience.

        • Flyberius [comrade/them]
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah, but all the movies tend to feature more or less instant travel, even the old ones

          • UlyssesT [he/him]
            hexagon
            ·
            8 months ago

            The more that was emphasized as an actual plot beat, the worse those movies tended to be received. The most fondly remembered ones at least implied a sense of distance and travel time, such as Wrath of Khan and Undiscovered Country.

      • Riffraffintheroom [none/use name]
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Yeah but it always conveyed a sense of time and distance and scale and coherency. Fast-travelling like a video game kind of shits on the "trek" part of the title.