Yeah, the headline seems to belie the much less scandalous story that initial surveys aren't as reliable as more time-consuming-but-accurate hiring estimates.
The over-the-year change in total nonfarm employment for March 2023 was revised from +4,048,000 to +3,836,000
which is still an enormous uptick in new jobs annually and in no way indicative of a weak economy on its face.
Blah blah neoliberal economics bad, blah blah quality of live metrics not included, blah blah glorious people's revolution blah blah things will be different. That said, this site's claims are trash and nobody should be taking anything the Daily Caller prints seriously.
Maybe archive the link? its a reactionary news, if i remember correctly
Yeah, the headline seems to belie the much less scandalous story that initial surveys aren't as reliable as more time-consuming-but-accurate hiring estimates.
Also, the "1M less jobs" number is absolute bullshit. BLS has the revision at around 200,000
which is still an enormous uptick in new jobs annually and in no way indicative of a weak economy on its face.
Blah blah neoliberal economics bad, blah blah quality of live metrics not included, blah blah glorious people's revolution blah blah things will be different. That said, this site's claims are trash and nobody should be taking anything the Daily Caller prints seriously.
This number is also exactly what is reported in the article. 200k jobs revised downwards in MARCH 2023
The total revisions across the entirety of 2023 sums up to > 1 million
Please don't discredit my conservative news sources. You commies could learn a thing or two from the other side
That was the over-year total, which is to say March 2022 to March 2023. We didn't create 3.8M jobs in March alone.
I know this is trolling but it upsets me nonetheless.
Oh you right I looked at the raw data more carefully and the revisions for 2023 total meant they actually their forecasts were about 100k short haha
Sorry about the trollin
To protect our morally pure browsers from the taint of reactionary cookies?
I think it's more to avoid giving them any activity that could contribute to their revenue.
It’s not like they’re going to get click-through revenue from us. Sounds like liberal consumerism praxis to me.
And what about CNN, which is pretty reactionary? Where’s the line we’re drawing in corporate media?
another consideration: why should we clog the internet archives with this trash?
Their storage space is probably already clogged with it, but when we performatively send traffic to them, it costs them money.