arrow-up151message-squareasdfadsRemoved by modGaveUp [she/her] to news • edit-25 months agomessage-square18 Comments
minus-squaredavel [he/him]hexbear9•5 months agoTo protect our morally pure browsers from the taint of reactionary cookies? link
minus-square@CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.mlhexbear13•5 months agoI think it's more to avoid giving them any activity that could contribute to their revenue. linkfedilink
minus-squaredavel [he/him]hexbear8•5 months agoIt’s not like they’re going to get click-through revenue from us. Sounds like liberal consumerism praxis to me. link
minus-squaredavel [he/him]hexbear7•5 months agoAnd what about CNN, which is pretty reactionary? Where’s the line we’re drawing in corporate media? link
minus-squareblight [any]hexbear3•5 months agoanother consideration: why should we clog the internet archives with this trash? link
minus-squaredavel [he/him]hexbear2•5 months agoTheir storage space is probably already clogged with it, but when we performatively send traffic to them, it costs them money. link
To protect our morally pure browsers from the taint of reactionary cookies?
I think it's more to avoid giving them any activity that could contribute to their revenue.
It’s not like they’re going to get click-through revenue from us. Sounds like liberal consumerism praxis to me.
And what about CNN, which is pretty reactionary? Where’s the line we’re drawing in corporate media?
another consideration: why should we clog the internet archives with this trash?
Their storage space is probably already clogged with it, but when we performatively send traffic to them, it costs them money.