Maybe you should google how to think for yourself, mother fucker

*I'm not talking about MMOs by the way, y'all don't wanna see my fully unhinged, a-guy - tier rant about that fundamentally misguided genre of WoW-clones

.

.

.

.

.

.

I'm going through a terrible time and am feeling compelled to share my aggressive thoughts angery

Meta-gaming is a fucking blight, death to America

kiryu-slam

  • abc [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    2 months ago

    let people have fun instead of turning entertainment into some kind of protestant self-flagellation session.

    counterpoint: let games be difficult without whining about how they are not 'accessible'. why should dark souls 'have' an easy mode? why should elden ring have objective markers? if you want to engage with the worldbuilding/actual non-gameplay parts of a Dark Souls or Elden Ring, watch a Let's Play or read the wiki.

    • Philosophosphorous [comrade/them, he/him]
      ·
      2 months ago

      just don't play the easy mode and you can still wank yourself off about ur l337 g4m3r skillz, and also neurodivergent people or just people with less time to dedicate to perfectly mastering the art of pressing the b/circle button to the exact timing of every bosses idiosyncratic attack sequences can enjoy the media in an interactive way unfiltered through obnoxious amateur youtuber meme narration. like in any other context yelling 'well just go read a book then' at someone asking about accessibility options in a piece of media would be considered blatantly ableist, idfk why its different for video games.

      • robot_dog_with_gun [they/them]
        ·
        2 months ago

        the problem with that is that dev time is limited and they're not going to put resources into the highest or lowest difficulty being a well designed good time because gamedev is happening under capitalism. that's how you get tedious damage sponges or a dexterity challenge so trivialized that the mechanical design is irrelevant.

        hard on purpose games are serving a market segment and asking them to dilute the niche thing they're trying to make to cater to players who have a thousand alternatives is really weird to me. there are wheelchair accessible nature trails and we probably need more of them but no advocate would suggest building those at the direct expense of hiking trails challenging and interesting to able-bodied people, so why are people like this about games?

        • Philosophosphorous [comrade/them, he/him]
          ·
          2 months ago

          obviously capitalism ruins everything and i don't necessarily blame any individual developers for a systemic issue, but with a public funded ministry of arts there would be absolutely no excuse to not have a suite of accessibility options comparable to, for example, The Last of Us 2. imagine if someone invented a new all-terrain wheelchair (naughty dog's above average accessibility options in this metaphor) and hiking and trail running enthusiasts (gamers) harassed and ridiculed and gatekept anyone from using it on a particular trail (soulslikes). that's absolutely ableist and its ridiculous that i have to point this out on a leftist forum.

      • Egon
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        deleted by creator

    • Thordros [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      2 months ago

      counterpoint: let games be difficult without whining about how they are not 'accessible'.

      Example: Nobody will argue that Hades and Hades 2 are easy games. They have an easy mode.

      I've never turned it on, because I play these games for the challenge of pushing my Heat/Fear as high as I can.

      My partner has it turned on 100% of the time, because they play these games for the story. So to speak. awooga

      The game is better for it for both of us.

    • barrbaric [he/him]
      ·
      2 months ago

      I support accessibility options so that disabled people can play difficult games, just make them options and have a clear default experience. Things like the skibidi fragment system from Shadow of the Erdtree and more obviously Sekiro's Demon Bell and Kuro's Charm or DS2's Covenant of Champions all show that it's no problem to implement a higher optional difficulty setting, so why not include a lower one as well?

      • abc [he/him, comrade/them]
        ·
        2 months ago

        FWIW I do also support accessibility options so that disabled gamers can enjoy games; Elden Ring definitely does lack in things like menu narration options & audio/visual cues, as I learnt from watching my dad play (he'd have to stand and walk close to the TV every time he leveled up and once completely missed the 'NPC has invaded your world' pop-up and walked right into them lol; although this is admittedly more of a 'he mounts his TV way too high and sits way too far from it' problem but still).

        I just don't think difficulty in terms of gameplay is an accessibility thing. Like, the OP I was replying to said:

        elden ring should have objective markers instead of relying on meat gates killing you until you find where to go next (i have never found the maiden i gave up after getting killed by that horse knight guy on the way to the tree right after that first camp every fucking time, fuck elden ring),

        Is this an accessibility issue? The average player is not expected to beat the Tree Sentinel or even throw themselves at it continually upon walking out of the Stranded Graveyard on their first playthrough of the game. The game specifically points you towards the Church of Elleh beyond them (the very first NPC you encounter right outside the Stranded Graveyard explains how sites of grace work & point the way) and uses the sentinel to tell you it isn't impossible to go around or go elsewhere before coming back to a difficult boss/enemy. The site of grace right there points directly towards the church. You've already been taught in the tutorial about sneaking past enemies. You can literally go out of your way to avoid the Tree Sentinel and encounter no other enemies (except maybe one bat, from what I recall) by going west and approaching the church from the side/behind.

        • barrbaric [he/him]
          ·
          2 months ago

          Oh I agree, I kind of have to assume that they were being hyperbolic as a bit. You can definitely make it to the church without aggroing anyone, you don't even need to sneak, just don't run right at him. That said, I did almost give up on Dark Souls 1 when I was told I could go up or down, didn't see the way up to Undead Burg, and went into the Catacombs so I do have some sympathy lol.

        • Egon
          ·
          edit-2
          21 days ago

          deleted by creator

    • jaywalker [they/them, any]
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is a pretty bad take and I hope you reevaluate your position on people "whining" about their inability to enjoy some games because developers don't consider them at all. I'm so sorry you have you hear people complain about their disabilities and how it makes it hard for them to enjoy some video games. Really tho, this is fucked and I hope you think about it.