actually some vampire lore states that a vampire turned that young would retain the impulsiveness and the mind of a child and therefore they cannot consent
Sure, okay. So let's be consequentialists here. 3000 year old with the body of an 8 year old as a fetish generally would mean that if acted on the victims would be fairly defenseless. Someone plays bg3 and genuinely wants to fuck a bear, if acted on the perpetrator would die a horrific death and the would be victim would carry on its day. There is no realistic scenario where someone is gonna fuck a bear, so who cares if they want to?
If it gives you peace of mind yes. I don't think anyone was trying to call you an awful person (At least I wasn't) but both of these things are awful for the same reason so it isn't the most clean thing to argue about without going into libertain shit.
More of a "The Pokemon Ditto can breed with a dead tree, an electric rat, a set of keys, a whale, an ice cream cone, a meteorite, a bear trap and a kangaroo" excuse
I'm not excusing anything. If people want to fuck their magically transmogrified druid situationship then more power to them. Have fun. Definitely don't tell your bearfriend to sit on your face a bear weighs 800 lbs.
Even if it was just a bear, the bear can consent. He can easily mail you and eat you, so you asume if it's going along with you it's consenting, same argument mc afee used to justify his afair with that whale
like why doesn't it talk or have more human mannerisms or anything?
from now on all druids must choose between winnie the poo and bugs bunny for their wildshape forms, expanding to allow the choice of the tasmanian devil at level 8
It's weird roleplay as some form of escapism. If it's consenting adults I put it alongside abuse and rape roleplay fantasies common in the bdsm community. It CAN be problematic the way some people engage with it, just like bdsm, but probably is not when it's approached by people engaging in it properly? I put the question mark there because I can't really say with complete certainty without deeper investigation and experience that I simply do not have.
How is a person, pretending to be a species that can't consent, less suspect than a person pretending to be a child that can't consent?
I see the bear roleplay as "weird but not wrong", but I have no experience with speciesplay. I do however have experience of being asked to do ageplay but not having that in myself.
Not trying to struggle session or anything, just trying to philosophize. I suppose a guiding value here is "the mind is prevalent over the body".
One is titillating content for consumption where sex with an animal is made "ok" by creating a scenario in which it's not just an animal but actually a 3000 year old vampire, you get me.
The other is not fiction at all, it is two adult human beings in a private bedroom doing consenting roleplay with one another.
I generally agree with others pointing out that the perspective on this changes because bears could rip a person in half. If you substituted it for a dog though with no other changes...
"This little girl is actually a 3000 year old vampire" excuse
Not really the same, simply because there’s not a mass contingent of real life bear fuckers that this would be encouraging and supporting.
You are on Hexbear
I mean do we know that tho
Yes. There would be corpses.
There’s not a mass contingent of real life bear fuckers yet.
deleted by creator
So can the 3000 year old vampire with the body of an 8 year old.
As an adult with ADHD, does that mean I can't consent? My gf will be very upset to learn she's been taking advantage of me
seems like the more important part
deleted by creator
This is a very reasonable response to what I thought was an obvious joke
do not underestimate a thread started by the nerd emoji
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
He can also wildshape into a badger, but Hexbear isn't ready for that conversation
"feral" will never beat the allegations
deleted by creator
Sure, okay. So let's be consequentialists here. 3000 year old with the body of an 8 year old as a fetish generally would mean that if acted on the victims would be fairly defenseless. Someone plays bg3 and genuinely wants to fuck a bear, if acted on the perpetrator would die a horrific death and the would be victim would carry on its day. There is no realistic scenario where someone is gonna fuck a bear, so who cares if they want to?
deleted by creator
So in your mind if the three thousand year old child didn't act like a child...
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
If it gives you peace of mind yes. I don't think anyone was trying to call you an awful person (At least I wasn't) but both of these things are awful for the same reason so it isn't the most clean thing to argue about without going into libertain shit.
https://youtu.be/oLveqRDZ9gs. About that...
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
More of a "The Pokemon Ditto can breed with a dead tree, an electric rat, a set of keys, a whale, an ice cream cone, a meteorite, a bear trap and a kangaroo" excuse
I'm not excusing anything. If people want to fuck their magically transmogrified druid situationship then more power to them. Have fun. Definitely don't tell your bearfriend to sit on your face a bear weighs 800 lbs.
Even if it was just a bear, the bear can consent. He can easily mail you and eat you, so you asume if it's going along with you it's consenting, same argument mc afee used to justify his afair with that whale
wot
Heh https://x.com/officialmcafee/status/1079863420458074112?lang=en
Thanks
You shouldn’t be thanking me
John McAfee the gift that keeps on giving.
Well that certainly is a thread
deleted by creator
from now on all druids must choose between winnie the poo and bugs bunny for their wildshape forms, expanding to allow the choice of the tasmanian devil at level 8
Looks at character sheet
Oh, bother.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Would you say ageplay is problematic?
I'm actually quite interested in an answer.
It's weird roleplay as some form of escapism. If it's consenting adults I put it alongside abuse and rape roleplay fantasies common in the bdsm community. It CAN be problematic the way some people engage with it, just like bdsm, but probably is not when it's approached by people engaging in it properly? I put the question mark there because I can't really say with complete certainty without deeper investigation and experience that I simply do not have.
How is a person, pretending to be a species that can't consent, less suspect than a person pretending to be a child that can't consent?
I see the bear roleplay as "weird but not wrong", but I have no experience with speciesplay. I do however have experience of being asked to do ageplay but not having that in myself.
Not trying to struggle session or anything, just trying to philosophize. I suppose a guiding value here is "the mind is prevalent over the body".
Two different things.
One is titillating content for consumption where sex with an animal is made "ok" by creating a scenario in which it's not just an animal but actually a
3000 year old vampire, you get me.The other is not fiction at all, it is two adult human beings in a private bedroom doing consenting roleplay with one another.
I generally agree with others pointing out that the perspective on this changes because bears could rip a person in half. If you substituted it for a dog though with no other changes...
