• InappropriateEmote [comrade/them, undecided]
    ·
    6 days ago

    It wouldn't surprise me if this were in fact true, but if you or @yogthos@lemmy.ml can point me to where you saw this, I would really appreciate being able to read about it. Regardless of what heinous crimes against humanity and all life on earth that the US would actually perpetrate in a large scale nuclear war scenario, I was under the impression that their nuclear posture and targeting strategies are "highly classified" and even though they don't have any NFU policy, they still at least pretend it's about deterrence.

    • weeen [any, any]
      ·
      6 days ago

      It was an article someone posted in a comment on here, It'll be somewhere in my saved so I'll try to find it.

      • Pili [any, any]
        ·
        6 days ago

        In the meantime I'll just blindly believe it because it sounds like something that they would do.

        • Tabitha ☢️[she/her]
          ·
          5 days ago

          Devil's advocate: Some military plans might be more of a thought experiment or training exercise or black swan event prepping than a serious we totally gonna do this. For example, there are plans to invade Canada, plans for zombie invasions, etc..

          Now to unadvocate for the devil, the "Zombie" plan can be recycled to apply for reacting to a US citizen led communist revolution, or mass rioting against Imperial interests, the "Nuke everyone but the US" plan might be useful if the US suddenly finds itself to be the last non-socialist country, etc..

    • AndJusticeForAll [none/use name]
      ·
      6 days ago

      Trying to find articles on this on Yandex and DuckDuckGo and not finding anything although my search terms are probably subpar. Some stuff about how it'd only take 100 nukes to destroy almost all human civilization though.