• AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]
    ·
    il y a 1 jour

    I might be wrong about that detail. It might have been just to get a camera shot because my memory of the discussion is that there was no reason it should be loaded at all. Firing a blank at someone isn't safe either though.

    • FumpyAer [any, comrade/them]
      ·
      il y a 1 jour

      Even if you have a computer generated muzzle flash, the actor does have to squeeze the "trigger" on the non-gun in the actual shot. There is no way around this, or at least there wasn't before CGI; the gun needed to be fake and the actor had to squeeze the trigger for the actual filming.

      The responsibility is on the hirer of the armorer to check their credentials/identity and on the armorer to not supply a live gun. I don't think the actor should ultimately bear any responsibility for understanding how a gun works, how to check for bullets in the gun, etc. If anything, the armorer should train the actor how to (double) check for any bullets, etc.

      The above is all a hypothetical situation in which the actor isn't the producer, though.

        • hotcouchguy [he/him]
          ·
          il y a 1 jour

          Looks like there were 7 producers though? It's it common to credit people as producers who don't actually do producer-things? I have very little understanding of the industry, just wasn't sure who was actually doing what work.

          • D61 [any]
            ·
            il y a 17 heures

            Producers do the work, Executive Producers typically just provide money.

          • SupFBI [comrade/them]
            ·
            il y a 1 jour

            Invest enough money into the project and you get a producer credit.