Angie Speaks on Twitter
twitter.com
Noname is a psyop pushing the woke version of segregation so that people don't actually accomplish anything and are too caught up in paranoia to bother attempting to solve collective problems. This is a convenient narrative for a lazy millionaire, not the diverse working class. pic.twitter.com/DNlfhE3FgX— Angie Speaks (@SpeaksAngie) April 11, 2021

Noname: "leftists should organize the majority of their colonialist nations and stop fixating on marginalized people"

British class traitor Breadtuber: "You're just trying to stop the revolution by pointing out I'm a LARPer who never talks to the working class and is just doing paternalist liberalism with woke socialist characteristics. Telling me to organize the vast majority of workers??? What a convenient narrative!"

she's one of the dumbest people on the left, props to Peter Coffin for leaving that podcast.

radlib "left" media attracts a lot of mediocre people because it is so easy to get clout and you don't have to be intelligent or talented to gain credibility. All you have to do is fervently sell party lines and have a histrionic/ infantile personality.

if I was a pretentious British opportunist, I would not make tweets like this because they would clearly apply to myself as an illiterate Breadtuber failure.

  • PhaseFive [none/use name]
    ·
    4 years ago

    I’m sorry but White Leftists are not the most advanced segment of the working class, that’s laughable if it wasn’t reactionary.

    The most advanced segment of the working class are the workers in the labor movement committed to Marxism. That segment is multiracial. I'm not talking about "White Leftists."

    In their position of racialized privilege, they have blinders to a lot of the struggles the rest of the working class has to deal with. And without constant study and self-criticism, they will not truly move towards a successful revolutionary movement.

    You are just describing petite bourgeois radicals, but claiming that it is a product of "racial privilege" rather than their class consciousness. The "racial privilege" comes in when you consider the demographics of the petite bourgeoisie, which are disproportionally white.

    • marxisthayaca [he/him,they/them]
      ·
      4 years ago

      The most advanced segment of the working class are the workers in the labor movement committed to Marxism. That segment is multiracial. I’m not talking about “White Leftists.”

      Within that multi-racial segment you still have various degrees of commitment to the cause. Let's be realistic here.

      You are just describing petite bourgeois radicals, but claiming that it is a product of “racial privilege” rather than their class consciousness.

      /c/Literature is quite literally hosting a discussion on the book where White Working Class, would rather abandon the cause than be ostracized by their White Community/family for being members of the Communist Party and working in Black Cadres. Don't talk to me about it being merely "petit bourgeois" lmao.

      • PhaseFive [none/use name]
        ·
        4 years ago

        Within that multi-racial segment you still have various degrees of commitment to the cause. Let’s be realistic here.

        Absolutely, there is a long history of once-revolutionary Marxists abandoning the genuine working class struggle.

        White Working Class, would rather abandon the cause than be ostracized by their White Community/family for being members of the Communist Party and working in Black Cadres

        Yes, there are countless tools used to prevent workers from aligning with the multiracial working class movement. Black workers also had to fear being ostracized from their community for aligning with working class movement.

        Aligning with Communists was often interpreted as provoking Klan violence. Also, it was interpreted as pushing "godless Communism" if their community was based around a reactionary church.

        Don’t talk to me about it being merely “petit bourgeois” lmao

        I am talking about people with radical politics, not the working class in general.

        The mass of workers will always act in their perceived material interests. It is the duty of radicals to teach the masses the objective truth: their material interests are best served through a multiracial union against the ruling class.