Dude’s an ultra

Bonus: https://nitter.net/uncle_authority/status/1721967810241335347#m

I guess the Deprogram guys are the Three Stooges now? But the joke doesn’t really work

Show

  • LesbianLiberty [she/her]
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don't understand, Zizek has good and bad information that can be easily taken from his analysis like taking the wheat from the chaff, but patsoc? What does that even mean in this context? I know what patsoc means, but how has that come forward in any of their creations or their perspectives? As far as I can tell as an enjoyer of their media (all three, not even sure if you mean Yugopnik or Second Thought) I've not encountered any sense of anyone having a PatSoc perspective.

    • rjs001@lemmygrad.ml
      ·
      1 year ago

      SecondThought is a patsocs since he is in the patsoc CPUSA. A group that uses terminology like “Bill of Rights” and doesn’t promote land back ideology. Those two things (especially lacking land back as a fundamental tenet of socialist movements in the US) come off to me as egregious symbols of patsocism. I don’t see any way that someone could be in a group that calls themsleves socialist while using American terms like that and ignoring land back in the US could only be that. I don’t think Yugopnik is patsoc even though I dislike him still

      • LesbianLiberty [she/her]
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        For all the criticisms of the CPUSA, of which I have many, I don't think ascribing him the entirety of it's failings is quite fair; especially when considering that he is simply a contributor to and not a member of the CPUSA as far as I'm aware. I think you're putting the horse before the carriage, he's simply a ML, Jackson Hinkle and Infrahaz are examples of explicit "Patsoc"s and the gap between them and Second Thought is comically wide. If the charge is simply that he's contributed to CPUSA, then, okay? I don't think that's the same as being able to accurately label him as under the same banner as these kinds of ramblings below

        Show

        Show

        Show

        Show

        PatSocs are bad because they adopt ML ideas and twist them into allowing racism, sexism, and queerphobia to run amock in their communities. They don't build anything and instead create cults with leaders like Lyndon LaRouche; as much as I disagree with CPUSA's direction and completely ineffectual leadership, I think considering JT due to his proximity to be on a similar level to Lyndon LaRouche is a wild overcorrection.

        Additionally, I should note that when I was a member of CPUSA everyone was very clear that all the LaRouchites, Haz fans, and Borgar King Caleb Maupin appreciators had no place in that space. I think you should criticize CPUSA in order to find the correct line, but I think you may not be using a common definition for Patsoc when it includes CPUSA

        • pillow
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

          • LesbianLiberty [she/her]
            ·
            1 year ago

            Eugh, Sam Webb, what a dickhead. Yeah, no, I don't know if patsoc would be the correct term or be translateable to other people as it's already got a pretty set definition, but there is no room for "American" patriotism. It's weird, frankly, maybe I'm abnormal but the US just makes me feel icky now. I don't know what comes after but I hope it's not the United States.

            • pillow
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              deleted by creator