• budoguytenkaichi [he/him,they/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    1 of 2 things should've happened:

    1. Rian should've directed the 3rd one too

    or

    1. Abrams should've directed all 3

    Either probably would've resulted in something better than Rise of Skywalker.

      • budoguytenkaichi [he/him,they/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        I prefer option 1 to option 2, but at least with option 2 you could make the argument that at least then the trilogy would've consistently been one guy's vision and he wouldn't have wasted the 3rd movie pretty much just undoing the previous one that he disagreed with.

        • Tankiedesantski [he/him]
          ·
          4 years ago

          I just hate Abrams for what he did to Star Trek and hopes everything in his life turns to ashes in his hands.

          • zeal0telite [he/him,they/them]
            ·
            4 years ago

            At least Abrams left. Kurtzman still has his foul grasp on the franchise.

            "What if the future was just capitalism but with Star Trek technology?" Fuck you CBS.

      • ssjmarx [he/him]
        ·
        4 years ago

        Focusing on the director is a mistake. The direction of Rise of Skywalker was mostly fine, but it was written by the guy who wrote Batman v Superman.

        • Pezevenk [he/him]
          ·
          4 years ago

          Lmao Terrio won an Oscar once for Argo and then he only wrote trash no one likes. Not sure when they're gonna get the message.

      • Mardoniush [she/her]
        ·
        4 years ago

        Lucas can't write dialogue or pace for shit, but he can write a coherent plot at least.