hexaflexagonbear [he/him] to the_dunk_tank • 3 years agoLol Twitter's overly abrasive style rulesimagemessage-square142 fedilinkarrow-up180file-text
arrow-up180imageLol Twitter's overly abrasive style ruleshexaflexagonbear [he/him] to the_dunk_tank • 3 years agomessage-square142 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
Need a hot feminist take need a hot feminist take. Oh I know "A woman could never write Finnegans Wake or Ulysses"
minus-squaresam5673 [none/use name]hexbear13·3 years agoNo they're saying a woman could never write a book as bad as Finnegan's wake or Ulysses as they are saying those books are hard to read and unentertaining. link
minus-squarezeal0telite [he/him,they/them]hexbear4·3 years agoAnd if they didn't then that's a sign of the times, and a mistake that can be rectified today without shitting on books written a century ago. link
minus-squarePezevenk [he/him]hexbear2·edit-23 years agoOP is dunking on the tweet. I'm pretty sure that sentence is supposed to be a parody of the people tweeting. It just came out weird. link
minus-squaretaxidea [he/him]hexbear4·3 years agoI kinda like Finnegan's wake. It makes zero sense and isn't readable but it has some sentences I really like. link
No they're saying a woman could never write a book as bad as Finnegan's wake or Ulysses as they are saying those books are hard to read and unentertaining.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
And if they didn't then that's a sign of the times, and a mistake that can be rectified today without shitting on books written a century ago.
OP is dunking on the tweet. I'm pretty sure that sentence is supposed to be a parody of the people tweeting. It just came out weird.
deleted by creator
oooh alright.
I kinda like Finnegan's wake. It makes zero sense and isn't readable but it has some sentences I really like.
Who doesn't love a good commodius vicus?
deleted by creator