I'm a little surprised at how biased it is in favour of newer releases, although I guess it makes sense that so many of the high scores are for movies made in an era where studios can be strategic about getting a high Rotten Tomatoes score.
Otherwise, it's not too surprising. There are some I like, and some I don't like, and I'm not expecting the average Rotten Tomatoes critic's taste to perfectly match my own.
Is there a takeaway from this I was supposed to get, other than "be skeptical of Rotten Tomatoes scores", which I was already doing?
I'm a little surprised at how biased it is in favour of newer releases, although I guess it makes sense that so many of the high scores are for movies made in an era where studios can be strategic about getting a high Rotten Tomatoes score.
Otherwise, it's not too surprising. There are some I like, and some I don't like, and I'm not expecting the average Rotten Tomatoes critic's taste to perfectly match my own.
Is there a takeaway from this I was supposed to get, other than "be skeptical of Rotten Tomatoes scores", which I was already doing?