• Feinsteins_Ghost [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    What exactly are the company’s ambitious goals? Send earthlings to die on Mars? Because thats whats gonna happen.

    • invo_rt [he/him]
      ·
      8 months ago

      goals

      Grift on government subsides launching more reliable rockets while using the BIG IDEAS Starship rocket to draw in investor money. mElon runs all his businesses like start-ups so there's always some impractical goal he sells to keep people dumping money into his companies.

      • Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee
        ·
        8 months ago

        The trick all VC startups hate that they won’t tell you:

        Raise interest rates so that VC actually has to be careful with spending

      • iridaniotter [she/her, they/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        This doesn't make any sense. Space colonization is akin to the colonization of lichen in primary succession. You're not taking over anyone's home. The issues with space colonization instead include matters such as: natural preservation, workplace health and safety, child-rearing ethics, resource distribution, pollution of the night sky as well as orbits, attaining human consensus in general (something private companies by definition are incapable of doing!), etc.

        • porcupine@lemmygrad.ml
          ·
          8 months ago

          I just mean in the sense that their objective is a monopoly on free land and resource extraction. This being Musk, there’s probably a belief that if he’s successful, he’ll be able to exert some form of leverage over earth governments with this monopoly that he can’t already by being a mere billionaire.

          • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]
            ·
            8 months ago

            There's probably a hard copy of Heinlein's "Moon is a Harsh Mistress" on his bookshelf that he never actually read beyond the dust cover.

  • zed_proclaimer [he/him]
    ·
    8 months ago

    elon cannot fail, he can only be failed. Every fucked up launch is historically momentous because "he tried". Fucking participation trophies

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      ·
      8 months ago

      Dae every failure trains the le tech and gets humans closer to interplanetary species and ascension and escaping the simulation so-true

  • Lovely_sombrero [he/him]
    ·
    8 months ago

    The mission was also as low-risk as possible, but the rocket still exploded. There was no dummy payload and far less fuel, the mission was much shorter.

    • jaspersgroove@lemm.ee
      ·
      8 months ago

      I mean, considering how many rockets spacex has blown up already this isn’t really that surprising. Sometimes the fastest way to figure out how to not blow stuff up is by blowing stuff up. And if it doesn’t blow up then hey, great, on to the next thing.

      • UlyssesT [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        It'd be nice if the privatized le epic explodey rocket memery happened without billions in government subsidies while people are told there's simply no money for social safety nets or any meaningful new public works (at a fraction of the total subsidy cost).

      • envis10n [he/him]
        ·
        8 months ago

        That only matters if you eventually stop blowing shit up

        • Abracadaniel [he/him]
          ·
          8 months ago

          It'll stop. Starship is still under development, with an engine type that's never been flown before. Their smaller rocket, Falcon 9, had many public explosions but is now the US rocket with the most launches and the best safety record.

          Soyuz remains king. It will be a long time before Soyuz's safety record is overturned.

    • iridaniotter [she/her, they/them]
      ·
      8 months ago

      The April flight lasted three minutes and got 39 km high, while this flight lasted eight minutes and got 148 km high. What do you mean the mission was shorter? Anyway, it's always a little funny when they explode.

      • Lovely_sombrero [he/him]
        ·
        8 months ago

        It was shorter than any kind of a real mission would be, mainly because of less payload/fuel. The first flight wasn't supposed to last only 3 minutes.

  • iridaniotter [she/her, they/them]
    ·
    8 months ago

    Lmao SpaceX uses stolen German and Soviet technology and still manages to blow up their rocket. Frankly I don't see them succeeding - the American work ethic is simply not innovative. If I had to guess, it's probably because of the 250 years of lying and stealing that their entire culture is built upon.

    • CrimsonSage [any]
      ·
      8 months ago

      Na Americans are just as innovative as any other people when freed to. But in elons death 60 hour work week slave factories all the joy and playfulness required for creativity is crushed out of you.

      • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]
        ·
        8 months ago

        Hostile work environments are so bad for productivity. But like every dumbass entitled middle manager I bet my-hero never learned that lesson.

  • SorosFootSoldier [he/him, they/them]
    ·
    8 months ago

    If I was the second richest man on earth and my government outsourced all it's space tech to me I'd simply not build rockets that explode.

  • LaughingLion [any, any]
    ·
    8 months ago

    launching a rocket that explodes in the sky isnt that big of a deal hamas can do it whenever they want

  • UlyssesT [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    making progress toward some of the company's most ambitious goals

    What weasel words to try to imply HUMANS BECOME INTERPLANETARY SPECIES and SPREAD LIGHT OF CONSCIOUSNESS TO THE STARS marketing bullshit. disgost

  • Evilsandwichman [none/use name]
    ·
    8 months ago

    ......yup, let's put people in this tech and send it out; time to just cut the red tape and not hinder progress; have the FAA do what it needs so we can make it happen.

    https://hexbear.net/post/1055401