https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources

      • winterchillie [she/her]
        ·
        3 years ago

        What's the deal with red scare? not too familiar with them but their forum is full of social reactionaries

    • KobaCumTribute [she/her]
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      Even the worst example of them "just being contrarian" that got called out recently (about the election in I want to say Nicaragua?) turned out, in retrospect, to be 100% true and correct.

        • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
          ·
          3 years ago

          Doesn’t he live in Nicaragua?

          Instantly disqualifies you as a source.

          The correct place to live in while covering Latin America is Washington DC. However, we will allow coverage from Honduras or The Dominican Republic, if you're there for... uh... reasons.

  • Chapo_is_Red [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Pretty wild coincidence that all media originating from America's official enemies is "generally unreliable" at best.

    • idspispopd [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      Really big coincidence how they suddenly had problems at the same time with CGTN, Global Times, and Grayzone all of a sudden in 2020. Just one day in 2020 they realized "oh those three are problematic and must be banned" and this was in no way related to anything else at all, it was a very objective and unbiased process.

  • medium_adult_son [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    At least they included the caveat for Bellingcat that they receive funding from the National Endowment for Democracy...

    If they were to click on that damn link to the NED, they would see that even Wikipedia calls it a US agency. It's not even a shell company when it's that obvious. Just say Bellingcat is funded by the US Congress, damnit!

  • RNAi [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Radio Free Asia is a reliable source, particularly in geopolitically charged areas

    :agony-shivering: