Have ya'll ever met eugenicists and racists? those are some of the most natalist motherfuckers out there. You think all the mystic woo woo "having children is like +1 good" bullshit you want, THOSE PEOPLE THINK THAT HARDER THAN YOU DO!!!

This rant is sponsored by yesterday's grandma demanding in the form of a question when I'm going to shit out babies for her and also random strawman comments in an obscure subreddit.

Edit: ITT: people actually starting to bully me for not wanting to have kids. Did not expect this on "leftist" website.

  • edge [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think the misunderstanding there is that anti-natalism is not (necessarily) an “ideology” to “implement”. It’s just a moral standpoint. i.e. you morally shouldn’t have kids because the world you’d be bringing them into is incredibly fucked*, but no one is going to forcibly stop you from having kids.

    * not in a Malthusian “excess population” kind of way, but just that things are getting worse as capitalism decays into fascism and climate change ramps up because capitalism has done nothing to stop it. It’s not that having kids makes things worse, it’s that things are already bad and you’d be subjecting them to that.

    • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      The point of any philosophy, including moral philosophy, is to change the world with it. And there's no real way to implement anti-natalism without Malthusian eugenics or genocide.

      • WithoutFurtherBelay
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or sci-fi tech or world peace and if it’s the latter, good luck convincing people to not have kids because life apparently can suck. Not saying that argument wouldn’t be true in that case, even- just that people are not going to buy it.

    • Tankiedesantski [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think that there are people who treat it as either or both. That said, I think the personal expression and ideological expression are very different things. Like how a disabled person who doesn't want to have kids so as to not pass on their disability isn't the same as a eugenicist.

      • Dessa [she/her]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, they're different, but the latter doesn't exist in any serious capacity. There are no groups of people practically trying to express anti-natalism as a sterilize everything movement.

        For the vast majority, this is somewhere between a thought exercise and a gentle plea to others to consider not having kids. Not disabled others, or poor others, but any others.

        • UlyssesT
          ·
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          deleted by creator

          • Dessa [she/her]
            ·
            1 year ago

            The thing about materialism is that it's trying to describe the way the world the way it is, and why it is that way, and what we can do to achieve a better future. It's inherently political.

            Theres no practical way to even pursue the goal of sterilising everything. It's purely a moral philosophy with no possible praxis. There's no way to build a political movement out of this. When people here talk about natalism, they seem to want to believe it's motivating people into action, but how could it? It's lile believing everybody should be able to summon portals --A cool thought, but at the end of the day, an idea that doesn't exist on any political spectrum.

            • UlyssesT
              ·
              edit-2
              18 days ago

              deleted by creator

              • Dessa [she/her]
                ·
                1 year ago

                Whatever caused you to post this comic thank you 😂😂

            • WithoutFurtherBelay
              ·
              1 year ago

              It's purely a moral philosophy with no possible praxis.

              Which is the issue. It can’t really be acted on except as bastardizations of the idea that end up hurting people.