renamon [they/them] to Main • edit-23 years ago*Permanently Deleted*trashlockexternal-linkmessage-square297 fedilinkarrow-up1151file-textcross-posted to: chat
arrow-up1150external-link*Permanently Deleted*trashlockrenamon [they/them] to Main • edit-23 years agomessage-square297 Commentsfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: chat
minus-squarekikkai [any,comrade/them]hexbear3·4 years agoThey'll probably code it so that the word fragment on its own will get censored, but the other words that contain that fragment will not be censored. link
minus-squareMarxGuns [comrade/them]hexbear1·4 years agoIt might be the best anyone could do. How do you come up with a regex that catches people using slurs inside other words in a bad faith way? Coming up with a good regex at all is sometimes really hard. link
They'll probably code it so that the word fragment on its own will get censored, but the other words that contain that fragment will not be censored.
It might be the best anyone could do. How do you come up with a regex that catches people using slurs inside other words in a bad faith way? Coming up with a good regex at all is sometimes really hard.