• SolidaritySplodarity [they/them]
    ·
    3 years ago

    That's quite a reach on your part. Ask yourself why coercion is the first place your mind went and on a scale from 8-10 how much of a role anti-communist propaganda played in that reaction.

      • SolidaritySplodarity [they/them]
        ·
        3 years ago

        You've (1) inventively extrapolated from "I thought I'd live and eat well" to "they said they were starving despite being a TV celeb" (with all kinds of false assumptions about how the South Korea detector exploitation TV industry works) and (2) interpreted self-deprecation of the kind you'd literally see on this exact website as suggestive of coercion.

        This is absurd and it's problematic to reach for anti-communist tropes so easily and without coherence. Please try to restrain yourself from feeding such crap through ridiculous speculation.

        In your hurry to defend north korea from imperialist propaganda

        Unless you're (correctly) calling your own words imperialist propaganda, this is not describing anything I've said to you.

          • SolidaritySplodarity [they/them]
            ·
            3 years ago

            Oh do try to dig yourself out of your own ass, you seem to have gone too far up there.

            Reddit tier faux condescension has no place here. Kindly go fuck yourself until you've figured out how to talk to other people.

            Now see, I read your comments before saying anything and no, you actually did lead with these insinuations and then doubled down on them. If you meant something else, that's on you for failing to communicate because no fewer than three separate people (100% of responses) have the same understanding as I do.

            Are you capable of any self-crit whatsoever?

              • SolidaritySplodarity [they/them]
                ·
                3 years ago

                Because there's no irony there.

                You're avoiding very basic self-crit, here. In fact, you went out of your way to excise the preceding sentence to avoid the new bit of self-crit I highlighted.

                Go have your shitty imperialist thought process elsewhere until you can handle conflict among comrades without becoming a huge lib stooping to misleading selective quotation.

                • comi [he/him]
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 years ago

                  Reread this thread, comrade, in 5 minutes from the start, you both got side tracked here a little bit

                    • comi [he/him]
                      ·
                      edit-2
                      3 years ago

                      Comrade initial point was, as I’ve understood it, that quotes were deliberately pulled to seem (to the western audience) co-erced and obvious lies (?), and he would like to see the full video (?). it doesn’t seem like revisionist ploy :meow-tankie:

                      • SolidaritySplodarity [they/them]
                        ·
                        3 years ago

                        That's what they're telling you they meant now, though it's contradicted by their later comments where they suggest that the quotes in question suggest coercion. This is their brain recognizing anti-communist propaganda and then... actually ending up justifying it. You can see the various interactions about what it means to be on TV as a defector and their imaginative thinking on what the quote on eating well means.

                        I'm happy to cordially assume they didn't mean to do that and instead meant to say, "here's something that looks like propaganda playing up tropes" and then aggressively bumbled their way through responses, though.

                        • comi [he/him]
                          ·
                          edit-2
                          3 years ago

                          Hmm, maybe it’s language barrier, that is how I initially read it: two comments are designed to seem coerced, and are obviously either untrue (cause she is minor tv thingy) or mistranslated or whatever context. Than some posts about definitions of tv celebrity, blah blah, and then you are calling each other names :sadness:

                          • SolidaritySplodarity [they/them]
                            ·
                            3 years ago

                            That's an interpretation I entertained initially until I read the deeper comments where they start speculating about starvation and being a regular on certain TV shows. It's also why I didn't reply top-level - the next chain down is where things start going off the rails. No language barrier, your reading of that first bit is valid.

                            Unfortunately they seem to prefer insults and belligerence as a smokescreen, something I'm happy to return because this isn't a debate it's a leftist forum where a modicum of anti-imperialism is the very least we can ask from obviously Anglo comrades.

          • TankieTanuki [he/him]
            ·
            edit-2
            3 years ago

            I am talking about how articles about this take quotes out of context to present a narrative

            That's true, but Deutsche Welle is a German state media outlet which seeks to present the narrative "North Korea bad", so I doubt the context would make things seem worse (although I'd like to see the video too).

            Edit: Oh, maybe that's what you've been trying to say all along lol. I see you edited your original comment for clarity.