I dunno, I've just noticed little comments and things here and there on Chapo and TrueAnon for example that kinda gives me the impression that they either don't take the subject seriously or don't care.

  • GreenTeaRedFlag [any]
    ·
    3 years ago

    I would disagree with your first point. I found foot porn more off-putting than furry porn in general. Furry porn is just a little to the left of what I think is attractive, I can see all the parts and know what people like/dislike. Feet are the least sexual part of the body for me, I cannot comprehend being turned on by them in any capacity.

    • Awoo [she/her]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Feet are the least sexual part of the body for me, I cannot comprehend being turned on by them in any capacity.

      I am pretty sure that's half the point. There are two sides to it, those that enjoy imposing their sexualisation of a part of a person that the owner of the foot might not want sexualised (thus it is "naughty" to do so) and those that enjoy being on the receiving end of a person sexualising that body part and some element of shame coming from that. Both are tied to shame/violation kinks, either creating it in another person or receiving it.

      • GreenTeaRedFlag [any]
        ·
        3 years ago

        I really do not think that is the case. Besides, seeing as I have neither of those kinks, this further disproves the idea that anyone can find foot porn a little sexy.