• zifnab25 [he/him, any]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    Well, except for the part where he fought in the crusades.

    One could argue that defending your turf from colonization by an outside force is also anti-capitalist.

    • Nagarjuna [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      The 13th century crusades were an attemp by Catholics from Europe to conquer Jerusalem for the church. The Roman, viking and norman invasions of England had already happened.

      • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
        ·
        3 years ago

        The 13th century crusades were an attemp by Catholics from Europe to conquer Jerusalem for the church.

        As part of a broader turf war between "Christian" kingdoms of Europe and the "Moorish" kingdoms of the Middle East for land in and around the Mediterranean. The fixation on Jerusalem was ideological, but since you needed to occupy the Mediterranean coastline to manage it, the fight had a great deal of material economic consequence. The English crusading down south just so happened to also have a vested interest in sailing past the Iberian Peninsula without getting picked off by Barbary Pirates.

    • Nagarjuna [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      At what point was England under threat in the crusades?

      • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        Barbary Pirates - aligned with the various Muslim occupiers of southern Europe - were harassing and enslaving English sailors as early as the 1500s. Raids through the Iberian peninsula were happening as far back as the 710s.

        • Nagarjuna [he/him]
          ·
          3 years ago

          Huh, didn't know that, that would have been cooler than him fighting as a cavelryman in the middle east.