I just want to admire Kira in extra crispy detail.

  • FlakesBongler [they/them]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Because unlike TOS, they never actually recorded on 35mm film, it was recorded straight to video

    They can uprez video (in fact, TNG was recorded on video as well), but it takes time and money that Paramount doesn't want to spend

    • SisuMarx [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      To expand on this, DS9 (and Voyager) WERE shot on 35mm film, but they were edited on video. So to restore everything they would have to dig up all the old film takes and manually edit it all over again, not to mention redo all the cgi stuff.

      They did that with TNG but it took a huge amount of money and labor so I'm not sure profit wise it makes sense to the studio sadly. Who knows though..

        • MarxGuns [comrade/them]
          ·
          3 years ago

          Imagine a future where we didn't have to care about profitability in creative works... a communist can dream :thinkin-lenin:

    • Crowtee_Robot [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      It's so interesting how ephemeral pre-digital media was. You'd watch a show, maybe catch a rerun on syndication, but that was it. It was always on to the next episode rather than even consider preservation for future viewings. Better to save money using video and even tape over older shows like the BBC did with Doctor Who. I lived through it and it's still weird. Home media came in like a firestorm.

      • DirtbagVegan [he/him]
        hexagon
        ·
        3 years ago

        The Doctor Who stuff is crazy. So many people who wish they could watch that now.