• TheDialectic [none/use name]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is good right? Venezuela is p cool and them taking another slice of pie good no? We already have them under every sanction. This is just vote of no confidence for US hard power

    • Chapo_is_Red [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      The Communist Party of Venezuela was pretty critical of Maduro in their statement: https://prensapcv.wordpress.com/2023/11/28/video-pronunciamiento-del-comite-central-del-pcv-ante-el-referendo-consultivo-sobre-el-territorio-esequibo

    • Great_Leader_Is_Dead
      hexagon
      ·
      1 year ago

      There's people living on that slice of the pie and I think they should get a say in this.

      Idk is there like some militant Chavismo movement in Guyana that actually support joining Venezuela? Cuz I haven't heard it it.

      • bbnh69420 [she/her, they/them]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Neither option is consulting the indigenous people therein, Guyana because their opinions would obstruct the exploitation of oil, Venezuela bc they can’t survey ppl who aren’t Venezuelan (and if they take the land, they won’t because it would obstruct the exploitation of oil). Live in reality, Guyana keeping the land puts their indigenous people through the same story we’ve seen all over Latin America for decades: company comes in, oil goes out, rivers and land are polluted for generations. It’s just a choice of PDVSA vs Exxon

        • Great_Leader_Is_Dead
          hexagon
          ·
          1 year ago

          This doesn't exactly leave me supporting Venezuela.

          Living in a war zone sucks even if one side winning would improve your life after. And here you're saying at best things would be only slightly better with Venezuela controlling the land. If Venezuela was doing this to support a homegrown leftist movement fighting Exxon I'd feel a lot different but to my knowledge one doesn't exist.

        • Great_Leader_Is_Dead
          hexagon
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not familiar with that but I'd be curious to learn more

    • usa_suxxx
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      deleted by creator

    • CommieElon [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not good and the US was just starting to relieve sanctions. Maduro just wants that oil in a biodiversity country. It sucks

      • Dr_Gabriel_Aby [none/use name]
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s oil in the ocean. They want the water rights. If they don’t take it, Exxon Mobil will. That also sucks

        • CommieElon [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          Awesome, more offshore drilling. Can’t wait for a spill.They can barely maintain their own oil infrastructure.

          • silent_water [she/her]
            ·
            1 year ago

            Exxon is going to do that offshore drilling -- letting them have it doesn't solve the offshore drilling problem.

      • Krause [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
        ·
        1 year ago

        oh no, america was totally THIS close to stopping their sanctions, invasions and encirclements of venezuela, but then evil despotic maduro decided to alienate the poor little americans by reacting to their takeover of a disputed territory through one of their puppet states...

    • Adkml [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why is imperialism good when Venezuela does it?

      Is Guyana like some fascists puppet state pr something, weird to see people acting like them getting invaded for oil is fine.

      • Krause [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why is imperialism good when Venezuela does it?

        It's not imperialism

        Is Guyana like some fascists puppet state pr something

        Yes, they are a puppet state of America

        • Adkml [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          Any reason it's not imperialism to invade a neighboring country to take their natural resources by force to benefit your country or is it literally "it's not imperialism when a country I like does it"

          • Krause [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
            ·
            1 year ago

            imperialism is not "when a country violates a border", it's the highest stage of capitalism

            and it isn't even guyana's territory under international law anyway, if you're going to call this an "invasion" you should also call guyana using the ICJ to unilaterally win the dispute as stealing

          • grandepequeno [he/him]
            ·
            1 year ago

            Guyana just gave their natural resources away to Exxon, in my understanding not to the benefit of its people

      • LesbianLiberty [she/her]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Guyana's an Exxon colony and this territory is largely undeveloped jungle with very little connection to Guyana

        • Adkml [he/him]
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The country of Guyana has less of a connection to Guyana than Venezuala?

          Is there any reason this exact same argument couldn't be used as justification for America to invade Alberta? It's largely undeveloped tundra with no real connection to Canada.

          Like if you just want to say "it's good because it's a socialist country doing imperialism" fine I guess but seems like the dick slapping that's going to come as a result of that is pretty predictable and easily avoided.

          • LesbianLiberty [she/her]
            ·
            1 year ago

            There's been many invasions which have had minimal bloodshed, some tanks and infantry here and without a fight suddenly this land's annexed; if the US isn't willing to defend it's puppet then who cares. Clearly it would be if this was all over the news like it would normally be, but no, it's not all over the news, so the US is by all likelihood not going to do anything because it's already bogged down enough. It's not good or bad, this is simply just political maneuvering and the culmination of a history I will admit I don't and you clearly don't understand. Testing every global south liberation project for purity is meaningless and unhelpful, and showing your whole ass by equivocating nearly a hundred years of American sponsored global terror with what appears to be a bloodless landgrab does nothing except show you don't trust nor understand those who are in global south liberation projects.

            I don't know if it's good or bad, but I know me caring won't matter, and I understand that socialist projects aren't perfect in the real world.

            Show

      • TheDialectic [none/use name]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Think about Poland. The ussr invaded it so thr nazis wouldn't take it. In his historical.moment the USA is thr 4th Reich so keeping any territory out of there sphere of influence seems like a good idea to me. I don't actually know about the situation but that is my gut reaction.