I support Cuba and understand that regime change would make things much worse. My twitter timeline is full of MLs going "this is color revolution" as if it explains things. It made me wonder, what exactly makes a color revolution a color revolution.
I've read the wikipedia article and what I got is most of them are started by nonviolent student protests during disputed elections or other point of instability. Many are supported by western NGOs. What makes them inherently bad though? They sound like a strategy without specific ideological leaning...
You tipped your own Answer :
Those NGOs are opportunistic, aren't they? I assume they are smart enough to support a bunch of non-horrible stuff on the side to muddle the water, at least. Like radio free Europe is pro-feminist and pro-lgbt in places where it's a rare sentiment to come by...
Radio Free Europe is not a NGO, it's a US government propaganda outlet. They support whatever serves the political interest of the US. If Russia were to get a feminist pro-LGBT government tomorrow, RFE would immediately start supporting "traditional Christian family values".
NGO's are opportunistic but the reason they get the opportunity to toppe foreign governments in the first place is the support they receive from western empires. That is also the reason we never see it happen the other way round, the thought of a Chinese NGO overthrowing say the Belgian government is absurd and they would be mercilessly crushed if they ever became a realistic threat.
they are Pro Feminist when they Cover Enemies of the US Hegemony ,... Then they are alll concerend about all this Issue , what ever can be instrumentalised to turn one against it...
It is Very simple actually : "You dont Know whats best for Namibia" - thats it - thats the core of the Anti-Imperialism ....because " you really dont know whats good for Namibia" ,
And as a Bonus : you know one "Thing" thats been tried allready...
Or do you proclaim to now whats best for Namibia ?