I surely don't know enough about physics to speak on the subject, but I'm preeeeeeetty sure neither do these guys.
I wonder what pseudoscience they're trying to push, or if it's even that far along and they're simply denying for the hell of denying a Jewish physicist
(burning coal doesn't convert mass energy though, it's an exothermic oxidation reaction)
im not much of an expert but I believe it's held in chemical bonds, which I think is electromagnetic
liberal claptrap
How dare they insult the author of Why Socialism? like that
There's this thing certain christens do where they take existing scientific models, cross out some of the labels and then write "god" over them.
Fun ones I remember from sunday school:
Strong force isn't real, it's actually just god holding every atom together.
Evolution isn't real, it's actually just god selecting what traits are passed down.
Ironically this has been proposed, though I don't think it's very popular
https://www.vice.com/en/article/8q87gk/light-speed-slowed
Its technically that the laws of quantum mechanics have not been unified with the laws of relativity. Relativity is very accurate for large scale physics (planetary movement), and QM is very accurate for tiny physics (photons, electrons) but they don't work when applied to the other.
nuclear fission is a mythological belief in the redistribution of energy/mass wealth from the god-chosen and deserving high mass particles to the lazy, uncivilized and chaos-loving quantum foam
any understanding of physics that violates God's will is false consciousness
I know it's Conservapedia, but they don't have to try and protect the Conservation of Mass so hard
Conservapedia is mostly people editing it with the intent of writing something absurd that they think a conservative would write. Cranks exist, but most of the stuff you see on there isn't genuine.
Right Wingers: E=mc^2 is
Jewish physicsliberal nonsenseMaybe someday soon we'll be asking Xi to send the photon torpedos
:picard-excited:
Watching conservatives on science and math even irl is pretty bad its like little kids finding a calculus textbook and using their arthritic to disprove it and then boasting how wise they are and how stupid all the maths people are. A really good modern example is the antivax movements vs scientific papers since they have a elementary school reading level vs college level reading level and biology jargon. Also plz god plz no one tell them every DNA based lifeform since time immemorialhas mRNA or my infinite laugh pack will be spoiled. My neurosci comrade hates me for this since he likes trying to fight the near infinite flood of ignorance but I can only laugh at it since is so absurd.
