"This is awesome. We're killing Russians and not even sacrificing any real people (americans)."
"It's better than that. It's actually a huge MIC grift."
"This is awesome. We're killing Russians and not even sacrificing any real people (americans)."
"It's better than that. It's actually a huge MIC grift."
Has he responded to that at all? Or is he just trying to pretend it never came up?
Yes, he responded to it.
He claimed that he was smuggling women from Eastern Europe on temporary work visas without any guarantee of work despite charging exorbitant amounts, withholding their passports and pay, stuffing up to 20 of them into a single condo, and underpaying them for their labour but it was actually a humanitarian act because he was smuggling Jews from an undisclosed central European country because they were being persecuted.
He wants people to believe that he did it for humanitarian reasons and that he has reformed.
I often call out Beau's followers and they always say the same things:
He served his time
He has changed his ways/I believe in allowing people the opportunity to reform
His work is reparations for the crimes he committed in the past
He served his time
Nope.
He had a sweetheart deal with a judge and the conditions under he achieved this deal have been sealed. He served months of a sentence that is customarily decades.
He didn't serve his time.
He has changed his ways/I believe in allowing people the opportunity to reform
Has he even admitted to the crimes he actually committed? How can he reform if he actively lies about it and pretends that his actions were altruistic, humanitarian actions?
Do you believe that the US prison system dispenses justice and rehabilitation or are you a prison abolitionist? Because you can't be both.
How much of his now-sizeable income does he devote to victims of human trafficking? How much of his activism does he dedicate towards the prevention of human trafficking and supporting the victims of it?
What restorative justice has he sought out for the victims of his crimes?
His work is reparations for the crimes he committed in the past
By amassing a large social media following and getting them sweet Patreon bucks?
By, uh, doing some shit-tier journalism with a veneer of leftism?
How have his victims gotten restorative justice from him becoming a YouTube personality exactly?
Of course, they never manage to respond. Shocking, right?
Why can't a single person on these entertainment sites like YouTube ever turn out to be actually decent people?
I think it's the algorithm. Lots of small creators are lovely, but the sort of people who get really big care more about fame, attention and power than they do about actually creating things for people to enjoy/learn from.
maybe that sweetheart deal was agreeing to work for the feds
This is exactly what my hunch is. I don't trust the guy one bit.
It absolutely was, anyone who still thinks it was just some coincidence that he became an "activist" mere months after being given a get out of jail free pass for fucking human trafficking is a baby
Someone should really make a bot where this gets posted every time his creeper ass is brought up
I agree. He's an excellent example to show people this really happens.
https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2021-03-30/google-moonshot-redirect-far-right-online-extremism-anarchist
And how many of our grifters have gotten half as obvious a pat on the back as this from the feds? Maybe Robert Evans / iwriteok ???
I also believe in allowing people the opportunity to reform, but that's usually involving things like drug crimes, or thefts, or other similar crimes fueled by socioeconomic factors
When someone goes and establishes a fairly complex human trafficking network though, it's a little different
I mean, I do believe that even someone convicted of human trafficking is capable of genuine rehabilitation and reintegrating into society but if he's not out there putting in hard work both into himself personally and in victim support/human trafficking prevention then I'm not willing to entertain the notion that he has reformed.
He essentially robbed dozens upon dozens of women of their rights, their money, and part of their lives by throwing them into deplorable conditions. I have absolutely nothing to back this up with but my suspicion is that a non-insignificant percentage of the Eastern European women who were working in hotels for a pittance would have turned to sex work to supplement their income. It's hard to imagine that it wouldn't have been an explicit part of the operation, whether by design or by dovetailing the semi-above board side with a more shady parallel operation.
(It's not like the victims would have been eager to come forward about it if they were forced or coerced into sex work. But if you take young women to a foreign country and put them into conditions that are borderline destitution while they work for less than scrupulous hotels and... I mean, the likely outcome is going to be that a large number of them end up in sex work and nobody is going to convince me otherwise - I'm not that naive.)
From what I can tell he was sorta like a middle-man in the whole operation but if you steal years from dozens of people's lives while you directly profit from it then you need to be paying back that debt to society for the rest of your life as far as I'm concerned. At least, if you want to stake a claim to having reformed anyway.