Yes. She occasionally drives at something interesting about Power and Love needing each other, but instead of breaking that down to the need for revolutionary change she uses it to argue for incrementalism as increasing power...and also that revolutionaries don't have love...it's not very clearly argued and could have been 30% as long.
She is using Nietzsche here. It's quite cringe.
I'm not going to watch the video, but from the description, she's using Nietzsche badly.
Yes. She occasionally drives at something interesting about Power and Love needing each other, but instead of breaking that down to the need for revolutionary change she uses it to argue for incrementalism as increasing power...and also that revolutionaries don't have love...it's not very clearly argued and could have been 30% as long.