>1st world socialists use the same hysterical talking points as other 1st world fascist failchildren
imagine being such a soulless waste of humanity that the only value you see in one of gods creations (literally the biggest group of animals on earth) is if they "taste good". Makes me think of what Nietscheze said:
The last man is the archetypal passive nihilist. He is tired of life, takes no risks, and seeks only comfort and security. Therefore, The Last Man is unable to build and act upon a self-actualized ethos.
:Peter-Coffin:
the petit bourgeois socialist is a domesticated creature that lacks the human potential of controlling its environment. These worthless failchildren will never be able to conceive of the idea of "its better to feed our chickens bugs than soy". I bet these woke petit Karens who make condescending tweets with communism rhetoric have never visited a farm in their life.
They're just complacent losers who think they're virtuous and strong for soyfacing about "Fully Automated Luxury Space Communism". The opposite is true, Walmart socialism is the ideology for weak people who fear hard work and getting sun tanned like their apartheid child slaves
it's the idea that FALGSC will only come about in the west, and insulates the white first world workers from needing to work, keeping their skin light at they don't go out in the sun
You're going to become the full time BMF interpreter.
idk why people think these posts are so hard to understand! they can be obtuse in some of the phrasing, but the concepts tend to be pretty straight forwards
Look, I'm a simple guy, I see a BMF post and I can't make heads nor tails of it :monke-beepboop:
well what is walmart socialism supposed to mean? utopianism is walmart?
yeah, walmart represents first world opulence and mass consumption
:yes-honey-left:
ealmart absolutely is a temple to opulence. it's an endless stream of cheap goods, you can get anything you need there
also where you get poverty wages and strikebroken
i get where its coming from but the 'benefit' aint really there for most people
Yeah but those workers can afford used xbox 360s so they’re basically bourgeois.
I mean it is, it's a material abuncance of cheap goods. that is something that most of the world does not have. it's not a universal good, but it is one of the big things of the imperial core that makes it the core
I understood the slaves part as a reference to current relationship between twitter socialists from rich countries and third world workers who indirectly serve them, (many of them literal children under slave conditions).
both are correct readings imo