>1st world socialists use the same hysterical talking points as other 1st world fascist failchildren
imagine being such a soulless waste of humanity that the only value you see in one of gods creations (literally the biggest group of animals on earth) is if they "taste good". Makes me think of what Nietscheze said:
The last man is the archetypal passive nihilist. He is tired of life, takes no risks, and seeks only comfort and security. Therefore, The Last Man is unable to build and act upon a self-actualized ethos.
:Peter-Coffin:
the petit bourgeois socialist is a domesticated creature that lacks the human potential of controlling its environment. These worthless failchildren will never be able to conceive of the idea of "its better to feed our chickens bugs than soy". I bet these woke petit Karens who make condescending tweets with communism rhetoric have never visited a farm in their life.
They're just complacent losers who think they're virtuous and strong for soyfacing about "Fully Automated Luxury Space Communism". The opposite is true, Walmart socialism is the ideology for weak people who fear hard work and getting sun tanned like their apartheid child slaves
10/10 on the :jesse-wtf: scale
God damn this is a BMF all-timer
As a concept? Absolutely.
In it's phrasing? No way. Lol.
It's a funny rambling, not an essay. The core concept of this is the very old take "twitter socialists piss and moan at the idea of maybe being mildly discomforted, hence they are just posers", all the rambling is just embelishment for bit sake.
The opposite is true, Walmart socialism is the ideology for weak people who fear hard work and getting sun tanned like their apartheid child slaves
:jesse-wtf:
it's the idea that FALGSC will only come about in the west, and insulates the white first world workers from needing to work, keeping their skin light at they don't go out in the sun
You're going to become the full time BMF interpreter.
idk why people think these posts are so hard to understand! they can be obtuse in some of the phrasing, but the concepts tend to be pretty straight forwards
Look, I'm a simple guy, I see a BMF post and I can't make heads nor tails of it :monke-beepboop:
well what is walmart socialism supposed to mean? utopianism is walmart?
yeah, walmart represents first world opulence and mass consumption
ealmart absolutely is a temple to opulence. it's an endless stream of cheap goods, you can get anything you need there
I understood the slaves part as a reference to current relationship between twitter socialists from rich countries and third world workers who indirectly serve them, (many of them literal children under slave conditions).
I always got weird pest vibes from Based Ball, this account feels very different imo
Black mold futures was @TrumanShow_IRL before they got banned. That account is a goldmine of posting material
all I gotta say is y'all already eat insects they just ground them up first so you don't see them all over your grains and such
post on BMF o7
Genuine question: can you not tell that your posts are very hard to understand, or do you not care?
I understand it
We all have to become farmers and get farmer's tans because eating bugs is better than child slavery according to some dead German guy
And automation and child slavery are also the same thing apparently.
Automation didn't impede the existence of sweatshops cuz sweatshops are still cheaper than robots.
Sure, but I can't imagine the "star trek replicators for everything" people want there to be sweat shops. I feel like that's the whole point of the FALGSC thing: that there's no more exploitative labour or any labour at all.
Of course.
The joke is about "people from rich countries, who benefit from sweatshops just cuz they live where they live, are lazy and hipercritic of any proposed strategy for how to solve urgent problems. They want utopia but too lazy to do it so they just complain"
Do I share this sentiment? No. Some people are like this, yes, but of course this is a generalization.
Again, the point of this shitpost is just some random take covered in rambling.
After telling me just what this post was trying to say, can someone give me a hand? My eyes rolled all the way to the back of my head and I’m afraid they’re going to get stuck like this
twitter socialists "(((they))) eat insects" failsons consumerists, Marxian ecologists
socialists talking points 1st world fascist failchildren
soulless humanity value gods creations “taste good”. Nietscheze:
The last man archetypal passive nihilist. Therefore, The Last Man self-actualized ethos.
:Peter-Coffin:
petit bourgeois socialist domesticated human potential environment. worthless failchildren conceive idea “bugs soy”. woke petit Karens condescending tweets communism rhetoric farm.
complacent losers virtuous soyfacing “Fully Automated Luxury Space Communism”. Walmart socialism ideology weak people hard work apartheid child slaves
a) Insects taste like prawns, delicious.
b) if you try to take my stick insects you'll wish you were blood eagled.
c) how many bottles of wine is drunk?
