>1st world socialists use the same hysterical talking points as other 1st world fascist failchildren
imagine being such a soulless waste of humanity that the only value you see in one of gods creations (literally the biggest group of animals on earth) is if they "taste good". Makes me think of what Nietscheze said:
The last man is the archetypal passive nihilist. He is tired of life, takes no risks, and seeks only comfort and security. Therefore, The Last Man is unable to build and act upon a self-actualized ethos.
:Peter-Coffin:
the petit bourgeois socialist is a domesticated creature that lacks the human potential of controlling its environment. These worthless failchildren will never be able to conceive of the idea of "its better to feed our chickens bugs than soy". I bet these woke petit Karens who make condescending tweets with communism rhetoric have never visited a farm in their life.
They're just complacent losers who think they're virtuous and strong for soyfacing about "Fully Automated Luxury Space Communism". The opposite is true, Walmart socialism is the ideology for weak people who fear hard work and getting sun tanned like their apartheid child slaves
Sure, but I can't imagine the "star trek replicators for everything" people want there to be sweat shops. I feel like that's the whole point of the FALGSC thing: that there's no more exploitative labour or any labour at all.
Of course.
The joke is about "people from rich countries, who benefit from sweatshops just cuz they live where they live, are lazy and hipercritic of any proposed strategy for how to solve urgent problems. They want utopia but too lazy to do it so they just complain"
Do I share this sentiment? No. Some people are like this, yes, but of course this is a generalization.
Again, the point of this shitpost is just some random take covered in rambling.