Anyone who thinks a camera is responsible for a photo being good has never tried it
It's funny that it's a macro of an insect too, a tough thing to capture well for even a good photographer.
It’s almost at the level of “just make a good movie” ridiculous.
He was pro crypto and AI is just another grift along those lines.
My thoughts exactly. He thinks he can make good money off of AI (and there's also the possibility that he think he could use an AI to do his work for him, his comics aren't exactly the most complex things around).
Man, those are some ugly character designs. Are they supposed to be ducks?
Maybe he used AI to make this and that's why it's so ugly.
This comic literally doesn't say or mean anything. Like, is this a real conversation? Is pebbleyeet even a real person?
His art style is so shitty he could just use AI himself with better result, but he probably feels safe since not even AI can have such evil and absurd takes
Yeah, whatever happened to that other Nazi who made stupid comics?
At least those looked good most of the time.
That one Nazi that made that 'cool' rebel MAGA highschool student with the girl who is reading the Bible?
I'm gonna sound like a boomer but I still have no clue and maybe its for the best. My sanity is waning this past couple of months
Oh, no, not Redpanels. This is the first I hear of them.
There's another guy.
Thats the default position of a nazi though. I didn't think that was in question with Stonetoss.
It’s almost as if art and photography have wildly different end goals
