The show is pure Barney the Dinosaur mentality. Everyone is friends and gets along, and sometimes when there are real issues that COULD have material impact on people, they just get resolved by people saying the right words and everyone being friends. Unless there is a serious course-correction and the writers have just done a bad job of progressing through plotlines after setting the table, then the moral of the show is that performative sensitivity and pointing out things like "colonialism" are on their own good enough to make things better.
If you aren't aware, the premise is Jason Sudoku from SNL (he played Biden in 08!) is an (American) college football coach who gets hired to coach (soccer) futbol on Nonce Island. This premise is pretty interesting because college football coaches are all literal psychopaths, and the idea of one trying to coach soccer is genuinely funny. The first season was maybe not as bad in hindsight as the show has gotten, but it was short and I watched it all basically in a day out of boredom (this show is EXTREMELY popular among football/sports media people).
Anyways, season 2 has some of the pieces for interesting conflict along class/racial/economic lines, but all the people are friends and friendship is the best so the problems get solved offscreen. Also, the dialogue is 99% soy banter and like, Family Guy style obscure reference humor but coming from a guy who really WANTS to be Mister Rogers. And some people do SWEARS, so it's definitely not for babies! But if you took them out it would be!
If this show is as influential as some people think, then I fear it is only a matter of time before the cheap network clones roll out a thousand worse versions of this and liberals talk about how great it is over brunch while nothing gets meaningfully done. Any sort of progressive ideals or "difficult topics" are 100% there performatively. I think Felix would put this much better than I did, so hopefully we get a "This is Sus" special.
there was almost something interesting when a player on the team was from a country where a company that owned a team sponsor was stealing resources from/destroying nature in. i was like oh shit actual conflict, i wonder whats going to happen and see if that means the team loses funding or has to fire players or something...and then it gets resolved the next episode with nothing mentioned. the sponsor is different now but...yeah.
its also very weird to me that a premier league team faced relegation in s1 but they now have 2 football stars on the team (dani and jamie) and they are facing relegation...again? are they just that bad??? like i know its not your issue with the show but it got me questioning the competency of the players.
That same character who had the issue with the airline had a good scene in the first season, when Lasso tries to give him a toy soldier.
Obviously Anglo TV is gonna miserably fail the liberalism and imperialism tests, so I dunno. I haven’t paid as close of attention to the 2nd season but I don’t mind it
Instead of addressing the complex dynamics of what not "sticking to sports" ACTUALLY means, they used it as a way for the woke girlboss to impress a young girl and then to sneak in a plotline where everyone is on a dating app that rewards being a good writer.