doublepepperoni [none/use name] to chapotraphouse • 3 years agoThank you Kurzgesagt, very coolimagemessage-square41 fedilinkarrow-up196file-text
arrow-up196imageThank you Kurzgesagt, very cooldoublepepperoni [none/use name] to chapotraphouse • 3 years agomessage-square41 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarefed [none/use name]hexbear11·3 years agoi mean use the context for what comes after it? "so why can"t we solve climate change" like, it makes sense because of what follows link
minus-squareReversi [none/use name]hexbear11·edit-23 years agoSo it's just setting up a false premise for the argument Example: "Black people were freed in 1865, why don't they just... do better?" The premise itself is empty of real context link
minus-squarefed [none/use name]hexbear7·edit-23 years agono? for example your example would then go into jim crow, racism, institutionalized racism, etc... like the video does lol the premise makes sense lol, we have more ability than ever to tackle issues, so why don't we link
minus-squareHaste_Hall [he/him]hexbear2·3 years agoYour premise here is "black people were freed in 1865" which is true, not false. This comparison makes no sense. link
i mean use the context for what comes after it? "so why can"t we solve climate change" like, it makes sense because of what follows
So it's just setting up a false premise for the argument
Example: "Black people were freed in 1865, why don't they just... do better?"
The premise itself is empty of real context
no? for example your example would then go into jim crow, racism, institutionalized racism, etc... like the video does lol
the premise makes sense lol, we have more ability than ever to tackle issues, so why don't we
Your premise here is "black people were freed in 1865" which is true, not false. This comparison makes no sense.