Yes, as a guy who sucks but is still more correct than Chomsky, Zizek, says, "I Don’t Know a Guy Who Was So Often Empirically Wrong". Beside which, what I hate about Chomsky isn't the position he takes, per se, but his own method of simply, in that droning way of his, repeating "facts" as if facts exist pre-ideologically.
Beside which, what I hate about Chomsky isn’t the position he takes, per se, but his own method of simply, in that droning way of his, repeating “facts” as if facts exist pre-ideologically.
There is no such thing as "facts" or "truths" that exist innocently and "pre-ideologically" because "ideology" is, itself, how the human mind structures and make sense of the world.
You disagree with Chomsky on everything? And he's the one that is wrong? Hmm.
Yes, as a guy who sucks but is still more correct than Chomsky, Zizek, says, "I Don’t Know a Guy Who Was So Often Empirically Wrong". Beside which, what I hate about Chomsky isn't the position he takes, per se, but his own method of simply, in that droning way of his, repeating "facts" as if facts exist pre-ideologically.
lol
Everything Ben Shapiro says can be "factually true" and he can still be completely wrong, because no "fact" or "truth" exist pre-ideologically.
wut
There is no such thing as "facts" or "truths" that exist innocently and "pre-ideologically" because "ideology" is, itself, how the human mind structures and make sense of the world.
lol the last angry post modernist
"Postmodernist" I'm not even sure you know what that word means.