I hate that place

  • Wildgrapes [she/her]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    Serious question, what is there to be done about it? Like, the US treated Native Americans terribly sure, but like, they also can’t give the land back. There are cities built there now. Massive infrastructure supporting millions of people. It can’t just be like, turned back over. What more can be done besides just like, saying sorry?

    Ah well it's true if natives had their land the cities and people there would, of course, immediately vanish or be destroyed. Guess we can just say swwwrrrryy for the genocide. What's that? Natives still exist and could be consulted and talked to about this very question? Hmm I don't know.

    This comment is hardly the worst on there but it certainly speaks to an American lack of imagination.

    • GenderIsOpSec [she/her]
      ·
      3 years ago

      :anglo-burn: imagination is binary. It goes from Doing Nothing to Genocide. Those are the only options.

    • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Like, the US treated Native Americans terribly sure, but like, they also can’t give the land back.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McGirt_v._Oklahoma

      The Court issued its decision on McGirt as well as a per curiam decision on Sharp following the basis of McGirt on July 9, 2020. The 5–4 majority opinion was written by Justice Neil Gorsuch and joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan, and determined that for purposes of the Major Crimes Act, Congress had failed to disestablish the Indian reservations and thus those lands should be treated as "Indian country". Gorsuch wrote, "Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word." Gorsuch further assessed that disestablishment was a power only Congress could exercise, affirmed by Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock.