CthulhusIntern [he/him] to askchapo • 3 years agoWhat are common arguments that you see the left make, that, while you don't disagree with them, you think are badly made and unconvincing?message-squaremessage-square264 fedilinkarrow-up181
arrow-up181message-squareWhat are common arguments that you see the left make, that, while you don't disagree with them, you think are badly made and unconvincing?CthulhusIntern [he/him] to askchapo • 3 years agomessage-square264 Commentsfedilink
minus-squareElGosso [he/him]hexbear7·3 years ago This isn’t a person across the street that you had no impact on, but one whose reliance on you was generated by you. By this reasoning if an EMT saves your life then they're obligated to give you a kidney if you need it link
minus-squareberrytopylus [she/her,they/them]hexbear8·3 years agoNot really because your need of a kidney doesn't exist because of them. However it would create an interesting situation where if you crash into someone, you would be obligated to donate your organs to them. link
minus-squareSerLava [he/him]hexbear4·edit-23 years agoBut that's a lot different from "you wouldn't need the kidney if they didn't steal your kidney" Most legal remedies involve someone losing some right due to their actions, so that another person can have their rights restored link
By this reasoning if an EMT saves your life then they're obligated to give you a kidney if you need it
Not really because your need of a kidney doesn't exist because of them. However it would create an interesting situation where if you crash into someone, you would be obligated to donate your organs to them.
deleted by creator
But that's a lot different from "you wouldn't need the kidney if they didn't steal your kidney"
Most legal remedies involve someone losing some right due to their actions, so that another person can have their rights restored