:jazz-ecstacy: :yes-hahaha-yes-l:

  • activated [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    The crabs will not be worth the media spectacle for months.

        • eduardog3000 [he/him]
          ·
          3 years ago

          It's not really what she contributes, but the public response to Charles becoming king. It could (hopefully) be the end of the monarchy, which you know won't go well.

          • steve5487 [none/use name]
            ·
            3 years ago

            the end of the monarchy is unlikely and if it did happen it wouldn't be a bad thing

            • eduardog3000 [he/him]
              ·
              3 years ago

              Of course it wouldn't be a bad thing, but it wouldn't go well either.

              And I think you might be underestimating how much people hate Charles.

              • silent_water [she/her]
                ·
                3 years ago

                is he the one that uhh visited epstein's island or was that a different royal ghoul

                • eduardog3000 [he/him]
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 years ago

                  Nah, that's Andrew, her next oldest son.

                  Of course they're all responsible for covering it up and helping him avoid punishment.

              • SovietSwine [he/him]
                ·
                3 years ago

                The wide sentiment down here in Australia is that when she croaks we become a republic. To the point where the former leader of the moderate faction of our conservative party basically said that when he was in power. More than likely we have another referendum on the monarchy and I think its a 60/40 chance of passing.

          • activated [he/him]
            ·
            3 years ago

            All of that still sounds like stupid British royals spectacle. No amount of crabs is worth it.