I've been going down the "well actually Bukharin was pretty damn based" route lately and I really like his take on Historical Materialism and his ideas about equilibrium. Deng and Xi come from that general route right? You have recs for their writings?
That's a good attitude but you should still give some of Deng and Xi's writings a shot. I think their theories are consistent with Marxism.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
I've been going down the "well actually Bukharin was pretty damn based" route lately and I really like his take on Historical Materialism and his ideas about equilibrium. Deng and Xi come from that general route right? You have recs for their writings?
I've been slowly reading through Deng's selected works, ignoring some that seem too niche.
In particular:
Integrate Marxism-Leninism With the Concrete Conditions of China
Hold High the Banner of Mao Zedong Thought and Adhere to the Principle of Seeking Truth From Facts
Adhere to the Principle “To Each According to His Work”
We Can Develop A Market Economy Under Socialism
To Build Socialism We Must First Develop the Productive Forces
As for Xi, the Governance of China is the way to go. The third volume was just published.
Not sure about Bukharin's relationship to SwCC. I don't remember seeing him cited, at least.
Dope thanks.
Bukharin could probably be somewhat summed up with just the sentence "To Build Socialism We Must First Develop the Productive Forces"