Not generally, no. Usually they consider it to be the "original sin" of technologies so to speak, the start of sedentary lifestyle and thus (in their eyes) the beginning of the accumulation of capital. There's debate on whether either of those things are true, but the prior likely isn't due to (as I cited elsewhere) sedentary hunter-gatherer lifestyles in wetlands. The latter has some more truth to it, but there's still plenty debate to be had.
Anti-civs vary more on agriculture, with most advocating a form of permaculture.
Not generally, no. Usually they consider it to be the "original sin" of technologies so to speak, the start of sedentary lifestyle and thus (in their eyes) the beginning of the accumulation of capital. There's debate on whether either of those things are true, but the prior likely isn't due to (as I cited elsewhere) sedentary hunter-gatherer lifestyles in wetlands. The latter has some more truth to it, but there's still plenty debate to be had.
Anti-civs vary more on agriculture, with most advocating a form of permaculture.
Ok so "anti-civs" are totally respectable average "hippies" and anprims just truly want to monke.
That's the short of it basically.