Imagine an American CEO being forced to do this.

  • VladimirLenin [she/her,they/them]
    ·
    3 years ago

    It seems like something thats only really useful for communist parties in power, outside like serving as some kind of theoretical justification or whatever for the excesses of the purge, for example

    openly calling it the "dictatorship of the proletariat" leaves open the possibility of an outward dictatorship

    • Awoo [she/her]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Hmm. I'm not sure.

      I feel like if the capitalists weren't in power the proletarian state would be 110% pushing the "capitalism is fascism" argument and representing capitalism as just fascism. All the horrors of it. All the time. The proletarian propaganda against capitalism would be driving the knife in just as hard as the bourgeoise propaganda currently drives the knife into communism via representing it as all the purge and all that.

      In that situation capitalists would benefit very greatly from separating themselves from fascism, and representing themselves as the very friendliest variant, the nicest socdems.

      For this same reason I think MLs acting as demsocs has been effective in places like Bolivia, with united mixed-ideology popular parties like MAS.