i know i shouldn't but i went and checked out the infrared discord. zero self awareness, of course they treat sakai like other liberals treat marx
https://readsettlers.org/ch5.html
i know i shouldn't but i went and checked out the infrared discord. zero self awareness, of course they treat sakai like other liberals treat marx
https://readsettlers.org/ch5.html
Article source
When we hear the phrase “Rainbow Coalition” within the context of the American political landscape, one immediately thinks of the doomed 1984 Presidential campaign of Reverend Jesse Jackson. The program that they presented was offered as an alternative to the neoliberal austerity of Reaganomics, which disproportionately affected a ‘rainbow’ of people, such as people of color, women, union members, queer people, the unemployed, and many other groups felt largely marginalized and alienated by corporate-controlled politics.
However, Rev. Jackson was not the first to introduce such a coalition by that name, and its origins come not from within either the Democratic or Republican Party, but the Black Panther Party. In Chicago on April 4, 1969, the city’s chapter of the BPP under the leadership of Fred Hampton created the original Rainbow Coalition. Along with the Panthers, other groups such as the Young Lords, a Puerto Rican Marxist-Leninist group, led a struggle against capitalism and police brutality across Chicago neighborhoods
Soon after its founding, several other groups such as the Brown Berets, the American Indian Movement, and the Red Guard Party all brought in Chicano, Indigenous, and Chinese communities respectively into a joined struggle against poverty and state-sanctioned violence. However, there was one group that every petty bourgeois radical liberal would have shouted down at in Chairman Hampton’s mix. That was the Young Patriots Organization (YPO), a group of impoverished white socialists that came from the Uptown neighborhood of Chicago. In the 1960s, Uptown became a refuge for economic refugees from Appalachia, looking for better job prospects.
But the question still stands: Why did the Black Panther Party build a coalition with a White Southern group? Anyone with only an adolescent frame of analysis would say it was a mistake. Yet, in looking deeper within the history of multiracial struggles across working-class Americans, one finds materially-shared causes. As economic refugees, the YPO organized to protect poor white Appalachians in Uptown against police brutality. In the late 1960s, impoverished white Southern migrants were frequently harassed and brutalized by the Chicago Police Department. Abuse from landlords was also common, and through these struggles, Comrades Bob Lee and Fred Hampton saw a revolutionary inroad to be made
Here is a quote from Black Panther Bob E. Lee on the time the Black Panther Party United in coalition with the Young Patriots Organization:
Why am I quoting this article? It's because in the same way I dislike the right-opportunist patriotic brocialists for being annoying little shits that erase broad swaths of the historical class struggle of our comrades of the Rainbow in favor of a simplified, and still terminally online, socialist movement, I also dislike the first worlder third worldist maoist movement that sprouted from Sakai's book for erasing the class struggle in favor of placing the struggles of our comrades of the Rainbow on a patronizing pedestal.
There must always be a balance maintained between the ultra-Left and right-opportunist movements of the land you inhabit in order to find the path forward to the Red sunrise.
If we're supposed to take historical analysis seriously, then the defeat of the Black Panther Party and the failure of the Rainbow Coalition reveal they were the exceptions that proved Sakai's rule
The irony of all these Sakai strawmans is that the western left operates as if it already lives in the worst possible version of Sakai's world, the constant doomerism, de facto segregated orgs, the sectarian squabbles, the constant infiltration of opportunists, the lack of national organizational unity, the inability to sustain political capital without wedding revolutionary sediments to Keynesian conceptions of the economy....
And agree or disagree with his interpretation of American Labor history, the man and politics described in that article are not the man or politics described in this interview, there's always this tinge of hysterics surrounding critiques of Sakai that I've found suspicious and more than a little over the top, legit the fuckin guy basically just took Matt Christman's take on yeoman American consciousness and treats and made a book about it...in the shadow of the Reagan revolution, shit really ain't that deep