https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_Battle_at_Lake_Changjin
The reasoning? Because reliable sources such as CNN, BBC, WaPo, NYT, Bloomberg, and Business Insider call it “propaganda department,” therefore the neutral stance would be siding with those reliable sources.
Wikipedia editors (the one's who're not just feds) have the be some of the most galaxy-brained dweebs in existence. Imagine having an interest in, and presumably being at least somewhat knowledgeable about propaganda, and not seeing how your "reliable" sources are engaged in it. Pure fucking ideology.