natural immunity is by all accounts much more robust and life long.
People who have had covid have gotten it again. There's nothing pointing to natural immunity being better, I've only seen things showing the opposite. I have no idea where you're coming up with this stuff but don't make things up.
if you are high risk you can take the vaccine. if you just want to be careful you can take the vaccine. if you are in good health, with no pre existing conditions it should not be compulsory because the jab will not stop transmission.
The reason western countries are making vaccines mandatory is because hospital systems will get overwhelmed without doing anything else and they don't want to do anything else like contact trace or payout and force people to stay home. Is your suggestion to only force the >40% of America who is obese to get the vaccine?
Something "authoritarian" has to be done at some point, whether that's actually sending people to your house to make you stay home if you were in contact with a positive case, or a coerced vaccine.
Most people who are unvaccinated think they're way healthier than they are, and when they go into hospital and prevent all the other surgeries by using up resources while on a vent.
this is not how the vax was sold to the public at the beginning.
In America you are right, public health constantly failed in its messaging and wanted to coerce people into getting it by promising things will go back to normal if enough get it. This did not happen.
In the parts of the world not in denial they were told masks would still be happening even with vaccines. They weren't sold anything because not everywhere is like America where contrarians whwould say "what's the point of getting it if no measures change". They also weren't told about 2 doses being enough in perpetuity because they were told "idk, just get it, it's clearly good".
The lower chance of infection is a very huge deal, and the lower risk of spread is very big. It's not perfect but it's enough to not clog up hospitals in places with a high enough vaccinated rate. The lower spread with vaccines is also going to slow down the spread and thus how quick things can mutate.
You're talking about the vaccine like we aren't in a public health crisis affecting everyone.
yes we are in a public health crisis. but it's not being handled like a public health crisis. it's being handled like a corporate takeover.
we are almost two years into this and in a sane world we could have fixed and expanded our (i'm in the US) utterly hollowed out healthcare system, put in place early at-home care procedures, etc. but we haven't. i just don't believe that the state, pharma, tech, etc cares about saving lives or public health in general. especially when all their answers to the pandemic (lockdowns, partial business closure, vaccine mandates) have lined the pockets of the ruling class while causing irreparable harm to the average person. now on top of this you think authoritarian measures are necessary? and you expect people to just go along and trust the people in power? when all the early promises of the vaccine have proved way off the mark? the left is so fucked if this is the line going forward. jezza (and his very cool brother btw) are on the right track.
Where did you get that info about the effectiveness of natural immunity being better than vaccines? You're letting the political machinery get in the way of legitimately evaluating the effectiveness of vaccines.
Big pharma, the state, tech, care about saving lives to the point of keeping cogs turning in the machine.
I think the domestic handling of covid were fuckups trying to do as little as possible to keep status quo for big business. Also politicians not wanting to do things that were unpopular and only acting once forced to with all those lockdown measures that were emergency measures that we seem to be in a stop-start cycle of. Thus dangling the unrealistic carrot of reopening fully if enough are vaccinated. This I blame on incompetence of trying to do nothing and then having to do something, and lack of preventative "authoritarian" measures.
But internationally I think the fuckup was pure greed because of IP laws that I blame on big pharma. Omicron came about because Africa isn't getting enough vaccines. Once Cuba can distribute theirs then I think that would help a lot, look at Cuba's numbers for demonstration of that.
Realistically I think China's method is the only domestic one that works. We cannot expand healthcare enough to deal with the virus and its effects. The field of nursing is losing people because of ptsd and stress. Partially because of the understaffing, but also dealing with a constant stream of preventable deaths and fighting antivaxxers.
I don't think we can train and expand quick enough to do be able nothing else. Seeing hundreds die is weighing on nurses, and even with enough resources to give all those dying a fighting chance that still scars people and makes it a field where we'd have to figure out how much to pay people to get PTSD. Even if we put all manufacturing power into making ventilators and start paying bonuses to people who do nursing school and give better nurse wages I don't think that's enough of we do nothing else.
Edit: sucks you got banned before responding to me. I had a feeling you were more denialist than you let on but didn't know for sure. Oh well
This doesn't justify anti vaxx bullshitt you're pushing. Contract tracing and using proper n95 masks is important but one shouldn't undermine the importance of vaccines.
it says that there is a 13% decrease in transmission between vaccinated and unvaccinated. this means that 100% of people could be vaxxed and covid would still spread widely. we are going to be living with this for the foreseeable future. there is no zero covid via vaccines. my belief is that the left should be pushing for broad reforms to the healthcare system and not solely focused on the vaccine. if people want to get it, great. a lot of people are untrusting of the govt and pharma, and for good reason. we should be talking to these people and offering solutions instead of calling them all chud reactionaries, which just isn't true.
I wouldn't agree with the previous comment that we weren't told about booster shots early on. It was always brought up as a possibility, just as there are booster shots for every vaccine in existence today.
We were told it was ultra-effective at preventing covid. That was true for the dominant variants of the time, and it's still true if you get a booster. They couldn't predict the future.
Fwiw I'm not accusing you of being an anti-vaxer. I am accusing the previous commenter of being one.
:downbear:
Joined 29 minutes ago with 2 comments, both of which contain falsehoods about the vaccine lmao
what falsehoods?
People who have had covid have gotten it again. There's nothing pointing to natural immunity being better, I've only seen things showing the opposite. I have no idea where you're coming up with this stuff but don't make things up.
The reason western countries are making vaccines mandatory is because hospital systems will get overwhelmed without doing anything else and they don't want to do anything else like contact trace or payout and force people to stay home. Is your suggestion to only force the >40% of America who is obese to get the vaccine?
Something "authoritarian" has to be done at some point, whether that's actually sending people to your house to make you stay home if you were in contact with a positive case, or a coerced vaccine.
Most people who are unvaccinated think they're way healthier than they are, and when they go into hospital and prevent all the other surgeries by using up resources while on a vent.
In America you are right, public health constantly failed in its messaging and wanted to coerce people into getting it by promising things will go back to normal if enough get it. This did not happen.
In the parts of the world not in denial they were told masks would still be happening even with vaccines. They weren't sold anything because not everywhere is like America where contrarians whwould say "what's the point of getting it if no measures change". They also weren't told about 2 doses being enough in perpetuity because they were told "idk, just get it, it's clearly good".
The lower chance of infection is a very huge deal, and the lower risk of spread is very big. It's not perfect but it's enough to not clog up hospitals in places with a high enough vaccinated rate. The lower spread with vaccines is also going to slow down the spread and thus how quick things can mutate.
You're talking about the vaccine like we aren't in a public health crisis affecting everyone.
yes we are in a public health crisis. but it's not being handled like a public health crisis. it's being handled like a corporate takeover. we are almost two years into this and in a sane world we could have fixed and expanded our (i'm in the US) utterly hollowed out healthcare system, put in place early at-home care procedures, etc. but we haven't. i just don't believe that the state, pharma, tech, etc cares about saving lives or public health in general. especially when all their answers to the pandemic (lockdowns, partial business closure, vaccine mandates) have lined the pockets of the ruling class while causing irreparable harm to the average person. now on top of this you think authoritarian measures are necessary? and you expect people to just go along and trust the people in power? when all the early promises of the vaccine have proved way off the mark? the left is so fucked if this is the line going forward. jezza (and his very cool brother btw) are on the right track.
Where did you get that info about the effectiveness of natural immunity being better than vaccines? You're letting the political machinery get in the way of legitimately evaluating the effectiveness of vaccines.
Big pharma, the state, tech, care about saving lives to the point of keeping cogs turning in the machine.
I think the domestic handling of covid were fuckups trying to do as little as possible to keep status quo for big business. Also politicians not wanting to do things that were unpopular and only acting once forced to with all those lockdown measures that were emergency measures that we seem to be in a stop-start cycle of. Thus dangling the unrealistic carrot of reopening fully if enough are vaccinated. This I blame on incompetence of trying to do nothing and then having to do something, and lack of preventative "authoritarian" measures.
But internationally I think the fuckup was pure greed because of IP laws that I blame on big pharma. Omicron came about because Africa isn't getting enough vaccines. Once Cuba can distribute theirs then I think that would help a lot, look at Cuba's numbers for demonstration of that.
Realistically I think China's method is the only domestic one that works. We cannot expand healthcare enough to deal with the virus and its effects. The field of nursing is losing people because of ptsd and stress. Partially because of the understaffing, but also dealing with a constant stream of preventable deaths and fighting antivaxxers.
I don't think we can train and expand quick enough to do be able nothing else. Seeing hundreds die is weighing on nurses, and even with enough resources to give all those dying a fighting chance that still scars people and makes it a field where we'd have to figure out how much to pay people to get PTSD. Even if we put all manufacturing power into making ventilators and start paying bonuses to people who do nursing school and give better nurse wages I don't think that's enough of we do nothing else.
Edit: sucks you got banned before responding to me. I had a feeling you were more denialist than you let on but didn't know for sure. Oh well
What sources? What are you claiming to be false and what sources do you have to back up your claims?
https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/uk-study-finds-vaccinated-people-easily-transmit-delta-variant-households-2021-10-28/
This doesn't justify anti vaxx bullshitt you're pushing. Contract tracing and using proper n95 masks is important but one shouldn't undermine the importance of vaccines.
it says that there is a 13% decrease in transmission between vaccinated and unvaccinated. this means that 100% of people could be vaxxed and covid would still spread widely. we are going to be living with this for the foreseeable future. there is no zero covid via vaccines. my belief is that the left should be pushing for broad reforms to the healthcare system and not solely focused on the vaccine. if people want to get it, great. a lot of people are untrusting of the govt and pharma, and for good reason. we should be talking to these people and offering solutions instead of calling them all chud reactionaries, which just isn't true.
So we should vaccinate as many as possible because it also reduces mortality in addition to other methods.
Nowhere did I say all antivaxxers are reactionaries. It just happens to lead people to reactionary communities.
deleted by creator
I wouldn't agree with the previous comment that we weren't told about booster shots early on. It was always brought up as a possibility, just as there are booster shots for every vaccine in existence today.
We were told it was ultra-effective at preventing covid. That was true for the dominant variants of the time, and it's still true if you get a booster. They couldn't predict the future.
Fwiw I'm not accusing you of being an anti-vaxer. I am accusing the previous commenter of being one.
deleted by creator
Do you see any of that being applied in any european countries?
deleted by creator