Warning: Slight spoilers

First off, in my opinion, The Matrix: Resurrections is probably one of the best sequels I've ever seen. The way it simultaneously feels like a loving return and embrace of the original trilogy, while also being an intense deconstructionist is fantastic.

However, in addition, a key theme of the film is how revolutionary struggle is commodified by the oppressors as a way to placate the masses. In the film, Neo, now back inside the Matrix, has had his past as a revolutionary hero - all his exploits and feats in defeating The Matrix and the Machines - rewritten in his memory to be the plot of a video game trilogy he was the creator of. The program itself has turned his fight and struggle into a product, a fiction, that now imprisons Neo. He is even being forced by his boss at his company to dredge up the Matrix IP and make a forth game, despite thinking doing so feels diluted and pointless. The villain in the film goes on to describe how this sheen of revolution, of progress, that the games have, is intentionally used to give the people trapped inside the matrix at false sense of hope and entertainment, all while keeping their unaware minds in control. I think Lana Wachowski chose to very overtly set the film in San Fransisco, amid the capitalist, controlling class world of the Silicon Valley tech/video game industry.

I highly recommend you all go see this new film, especially if you're a fan of the original. It continues the story in an incredibly creative way that feels like an antithesis to the glut of cinematic universes and IP products fed through the film industry in the last 20 years. Not to mention it's still fun as hell and full of great style and action.

Also, if you're interested, on the podcast I do with my friend, we covered the trans-revolutionary politics of the original trilogy in last weeks episode and the episode we put out today, so check that out if you want: https://open.spotify.com/episode/6m4X8kWbVbyucC5QM1hQgk https://open.spotify.com/episode/2mdoEvOHnxgya3CovXcgT5

  • Catalyst512 [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    I've only seen the first movie, is it necessary to watch the others before seeing the new one?

    • blly509 [he/him,any]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Yeah, I watched it earlier and you definitely should at least read the Wikipedia summaries or something like that. Especially to semi understand the one scene where a random French guy appears and starts yelling at everybody about how shit movies are these days in the middle of a massive fight. It definitely builds on the trilogy.

    • snott_morrison [comrade/them]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Matrix 1 is a genuine classic for a reason and literally about legit, non-watered down revolutionaries. Name me another Hollywood blockbuster which has it's heroes openly massacring cops umproted.

      2 is also really good, maybe even better action, but doesn't really add much thematically. 3 is fine.

      • blly509 [he/him,any]
        ·
        3 years ago

        To be fair, most of the people shot in this movie are cops. The rest are "swarm people" which has a whole other thing going on there. But that coffee shop mini-finale was definitely Neo and friends mowing down FBI agents.

    • LilComrade [comrade/them]
      ·
      3 years ago

      i had only seen the first one and still could follow the new one well enough. reading the wiki summaries for 2 and 3 will probably help you figure out a few small scenes in the new one but i didn't think it was necessary.