I've been thinking a bunch lately about technological increases in productive efficiency, and about some of the different ways that the capitalist pigs scheme to retain control over newfound profits through their manipulation of the means of production.
For example, I remember reading years ago that because of the increase in productivity associated with the modernization of washing machines, modern laundry detergent products are actually way more effective than they need to be (and that their marketing implies). When the bottle tells you to fill up the cap to the marked line, that's actually way more detergent than you need to use for a regular ass load of laundry. Like you literally need somewhere like a third or half of the "recommended" amount of detergent that it says on the bottle lol.
This is because the detergent producers’ profits are tailored to the status quo of their production; if consumption was suddenly halved, the company would have a crisis of overproduction that would eat into their profit margin. obviously this didn't simply happen all at once - but the small increases in efficiency created by the technological boom was not met with an appropriate rise in wages.
I want to start trying to investigate more examples of these situations and products that have been bent to the bourgeoisies' benefit rather than the proles'. I think that trying to become aware of these things is the first step to agitating around concrete ways that people can reclaim value created by these ‘hidden efficiencies,’ as I’ve currently taken to calling them. I'm also very open to suggestions for names that are more clear lol.
What are some hidden efficiencies you’ve noticed in your area of study, profession, or interest?
No thoughts, head empty, but I like this question.
Potentially how long most smartphones would actually last if you could swap out the batteries.
:thinking-about-it:
There’s a reason that cell phone companies don’t finance any of the repairable smartphones
this is defo the sort of stuff that I'm thinking of! like, the hidden costs for products that the bourgeoisie passes off onto the consumer, things that will need to eventually change as we shift toward a socialist degrowth
Well it turns out that social media websites are pretty simple bits of software with an entire corporate campus’ worth of advertising tech attached to their backends
:sicko-yes: now we're talking
There was a Google project to make phones modular and repairable like desktop computers are. Haven't checked in on it in years but I assume it was abandoned.
The Pinephone has a user-replaceable battery, I'm gonna see if it's viable as an Android phone replacement
The Pinephone isn’t a daily driver yet but it’s getting there. Project Aura was dropped because modularity requires abandoning a lot of the optimizations in size and heat that phones have made over the past few decades. And I’m guessing there were issues in getting manufacturers on board and making it profitable as well
Thanks for the info! This will actually save me a pretty good chunk of time.
i always buy phones with the highest possible battery life. been using the same one for 7 years with no problem as a result. no need to swap out the battery if it just lasts forever and takes forever to degrade :think-about-it: i think theyll probably be rebuilding the network infrastructure before i need to replace this thing. 120 dollars for 7 years, id say thats a good deal. but its gonna last longer than that. and i dont have to worry about buying a new battery all the time cause its shorting out
But can you play gatcha games :think-about-it: can you play rwby amity arena
why would i ever do that
also pretty sure you can emulate android on your computer if you really needed it
Ideally you'd also want better software support and optimization, if that was the case probably just short of a decade. If you made phones truely to enhance the life of the user probably another 5 years