It's common here to criticize Great Man Theory, in that it's not just one person that caused changes, it's many. However, where I'm lost is where they further imply that things happening have absolutely nothing to do with individual choice, and material conditions are the only thing that matters. This really just sounds like predestination with extra steps, as in, your material conditions will choose whatever actions you take, which completely loses me.

The logical conclusion to this mindset is that organization and trying to do political action is pointless, after all, material conditions will either make it happen or not make it happen, which I don't think anyone is trying to say.

  • Baekya [comrade/them]
    ·
    3 years ago

    my understanding is that dialectics is the constant interaction of material conditions and the system that "choices" create. People often choose the path of least resistance that material conditions have lead to. On an individual level people can contradict the system but ultimately cannot change the path of least resistance and the actions of others without changing material conditions.

    • Apolonio
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      deleted by creator