Context : talking about pro-cop libs

Would you agree that people generally have the belief that the police are essential? I think that it causes people to not be able to imagine society without them

Response I got:

That’s a straw man argument, you are building up an effigy to burn.

Idk plz help

  • comi [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    That’s fallacy of fallacies: seeing fallacies everywhere instead of talking like a normal person

    • raven [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      Um actually this is the fallacy of fallacies fallacy where you accuse someone of being overly pedantic to avoid engaging in the marketplace of ideas.

      It's a little phallus-y :kelly:

      • comi [he/him]
        ·
        3 years ago

        Much phallic talk from someone about to be in a locker :stirner-shocked:

        • raven [he/him]
          ·
          3 years ago

          You're literally strawmanning me right now uvu

          • comi [he/him]
            ·
            3 years ago

            It’s called locker-manning :soviet-huff:

  • Dimmer06 [he/him,comrade/them]
    ·
    3 years ago

    A straw man is when you say your opponent believes or advocates for something that they do not. You're taking a roundabout way to posit a thesis and asking if your interlocutor agrees with you. You're not even accusing them of possessing that belief.

  • ValiumAnarchist [none/use name]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Just point out that the whole point of fallacies is to use them to make your argument better and destroy your opponents argument. That’s their rhetorical use. Just naming the fallacy (inaccurately because you’re not even using one here, you’re positing an idea and asking if they agree) isn’t an automatic win button, it’s proof they dont have an argument.

  • Ericthescruffy [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    You're not making a straw man argument with this statement, but his "you are building up an effigy to burn" suggests to me that they feel (correct or incorrect) that you are laying the ground work for one. Hasn't happened yet..but he presumes to know where the argument is leading. Either way he sounds insufferable.

  • D61 [any]
    ·
    3 years ago

    It would be a straw man if "people were anti-cop" and your argument was based on "people are pro-cop".

    The worst that could be said of your argument is that its generalizing.

    • SaniFlush [any, any]
      ·
      3 years ago

      careful, they'll do that thing where they try to "win the conversation" by mansplaining to you non-stop until you run out of time.

  • D61 [any]
    ·
    3 years ago

    “You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.” -Inigo Montoya,

  • UlyssesT
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    deleted by creator

  • GreenTeaRedFlag [any]
    ·
    3 years ago

    no. You are stating what you believe others think, and then positing what that might change about their perspective.

  • Llituro [he/him, they/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    Offering a radical departure from typical context isn't a strawman. If you said that every single cop was literally a nazi-worshipping klansman, that's sort of a straw man.

    well i guess that's kind of true, but you get the point