Do you think he should’ve just drawn on the kid rather than try to dive on him? Seems in the state the shooter was in he would’ve shot him if he had pulled his weapon, not surrendered. Should he have just shot him while he was down? What was tactically the best option? And legally?
I’m not sure whether it’s a weakness or a strength that for someone on the left, the non-lethal option was what he went for. You just know any CHUD would’ve shot first asked questions later, as proven by the fash baby.
Bring a weapon only if you are completely prepared to use it. Willing, trained, and equipment in good working order. Anything less is playing pretend, and will make you a target with no capacity to retaliate. People will expect you to be able to defend yourself and others and find out you just hoped looking tough would protect you. Please please please do not bring an unloaded weapon to anything.