Permanently Deleted

  • riley
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • geikei [none/use name]
      ·
      3 years ago

      This is even worse cause commandism usualy at least presuposes that you remotely know what you are talking about and that on another situation when the soil is fertile and the masses are ready, educated and well organized or united behind it those same actions ,since the public has caught up to them and embraced them, would be the correct choice and course

      These kids ,that so easily can insert themselves as leaders and spokespeople , have literally no idea what they are talking about and are utterly incoherent ideologicaly and theoraticaly and dont have any understanding of politics . This is the worse possible combo of doing commandism with utterly radlib brain worms. A remotely well read communist doing the same actions media wise would still be commandism and bad but it wouldnt have been such a unmitigated disaster

      • riley
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

          • InternetLefty [he/him]
            ·
            3 years ago

            Commandism is telling the masses what to do expecting that they already have the ideological understanding that you do, which causes people to become confused, question the effort of the organization, and feel left out. Tailism is the opposite - expecting that the masses are not as ideologically convicted as they actually are and failing to lead them to the next conclusion, causing friction and again the feeling that the organization is leaving them out or worse is backwards/not attentive to the concerns of the masses. An organization should lead the masses, include them in party organizing, continue their revolutionary education, and work effectively with them to build revolution. My interpretation