the newest mod of 28 days (and 21 years old) did like five other interviews with major outlets that have yet to be released. seems like the person has never been employed.

:bear-despair:

Who's /u/Kimezukae ? Why did he do interviews?

Hello, I'm a 21 years old male, long-term unemployed and an Anarchist. I've been surfing this Subreddit since 2020 and it helped me in my journey when I started to began to be unemployed. When I began to read this Subreddit I was a leftist-liberal, namely a social->democrat. I've been reading some of the recommended literature from the library since then, for example Bob Black's "Abolition of Work" and have been radicalized to an Anarchist.

  • thirstywizard [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    They were fucked when they took out MLs, historical vanguard for a reason baby. Instead, they'd rather make the same mistakes of the 1920s labor movement 100 years later, we'll only move backwards until they fuckin read and do their mutual aid projects with careful thought and goals, rather than simple terminal online inaction or infinite projects with no vision.

    • HodgePodge [love/loves]
      ·
      3 years ago

      They were fucked when they got sectarian. Dividing the left is fucking stupid, especially in the imperial core. It's baby-brained duebro behavior.

      • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]
        hexagon
        ·
        3 years ago

        the only reason it isn't happening here is that the mods prune it heavily, replies here had some sectarian takes until removal

        • HodgePodge [love/loves]
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          Yeah, that's what I mean. You need to have mods that aren't sectarian because there is a certain kind of person that thinks gatekeeping leftism is praxis even though it's actually only a sign the person is a loser lol

      • ferristriangle [he/him]
        ·
        3 years ago

        Censorship is good actually.

        Any competent party never would have let this person go on Fox News. Message discipline exists for a reason, and this whole event shows why you only let trained and knowledgeable experts who are accountable to the people through democratic centralism handle sensitive and important tasks like this. One person's ego just did irreparable damage to the interests of that group's 1.6 million members.

      • HodgePodge [love/loves]
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        External censorship is good. You want to have a unified front. Internally, you discuss and talk through stuff, reach a consensus, and then everyone states that externally.

        A group censoring who can speak for them is democratic because it prevents people from acting unilaterally and shit.

        Agree with ya on elitism and nepotism.